Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

BMIR part 3 of 4 - NLP Demonstration - Behavioral Manifestations of Internal Representation

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
607 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 28, 2009

http://www.michaeljemery.com
http://store.attentionshifting.com
-- If you are interested in personal development coaching with Michael, sign up for a trial session in Michael's Coaching Gym. http://michaeljemery.com/coaching-gym

BMIR's are minimal nonverbal and verbal accessing cues corresponding to internal 4-tuples (VAKOG). Okay, that probably sounds like giberish to most people outside of the NLP community.

In neuro-linguistic programming (NLP), there is the theory that when people process information (daydream, visualize, remember, imagine, decide, pay attention...) subtle nonverbal and verbal cues occur that reveal their thinking process. These are referred to as accessing cues.

Visually, I typically perceive changes in the following: facial muscle tone, skin color, lower lip size, eye movements, pupil size, head tilt, breathing (depth/rate), posture (generally referred to as physiology), angle of spine, gestures.

On an auditory level, I listen to changes in: tone, tempo, locus,pitch, volume, rhythm, pauses, and predicates.

In my opinion, predicates (the words people use to describe an experience) reveals a lot about the way that they are processing information, but are so often ignored by people in everyday conversations leading to confusion and disagreements. Examples could be as follows:

Visual - "I can see what you mean..."
Auditory - "This sounds fine to me..."
Kinesthetic - "I don't know, I get a bad feeling about it..."

Most of the time, people communicate without too much conscious awareness of the words they use as descriptors... The words just seem to feel right, sound good, make sense, or appear to create the best mental imagery. Sometimes we get stuck in a way of communicating and forget that other people perceive the world through different lead systems (preferred sense to process experiences). Much confusion in conversation can easily be avoided by paying attention to the lead system of the person you are communicating with so that you can "speak their language".

This is the realm of both problems and solutions. I can detect the way a problem is being processed by paying attention to the accessing cues and by changing submodalities, reframing, and future-pacing events I can empower a client to create ideal outcomes that move them toward a big picture goal or result.

Again, you've got nothing to lose and everything to gain by getting on the wait list for my Coaching Gym: http://michaeljemery.com/coaching-gym/

In the meantime, be sure to listen to my free audio programs and if you like those, invest in my inexpensive personal development programs available at amazon.com or http://store.attentionshifting.com

Be Amazing!

Michael J. Emery, M.A., C.Ht., M.NLP
Personal Development Coach & Trainer
www.michaeljemery.com

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (mikeeshift)

  • how do you react towards eye language?

  • it really depends upon the context. often when working with a client, i don't share that i pay attention to their eye accessing cues - if i can see their eyes. doing so usually causes people to become self conscious about it. eye accessing cues do show me insights as to how they process information/experiences, but there are no absolutes. does this answer your question?

see all

All Comments (3)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • A m a z i n g ! thank you!

  • It does somehow. Thanks.

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more