HR 1444 HR 1388 Criminal Statutes and Ramifications

http://www.fbi.gov/hq/cid/civilrights/statutes.htm#section241
Not only do these two pieces of legislation violate your constitutional rights. They also violate current criminal statutes. Does that make our congressmen criminals for even drafting them to begin with?

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• HR
• 1444
• 1388
• title
• 18
• united
• states
• code
• usc
• section
• 242
• criminal
• congressmen
• give
• act
• GIVE
• ACT
• G.I.V.E
• national
• civilian
• community
• corps
• mandatory
• volunteerism
• youth
• brigade

[Vorpalbite]

Why did you fail to mention the same rules for Political expression also apply to Religious expression - - - - U also forgot to mention the MANDITORY Schip

[jboyko3]

That's the reason I post links that are relevant to the topic of discussion with my videos. So ever-vigilant people like you can pick up on things I miss. I do my videos with the intention of giving you a basic run down of the issue and then give you the resources to determine for yourself whether or not I'm on or off target. That way, if it comes off like I'm force-feeding my point of view, you have the means to contradict it.

[ranger480X]

I think you can reasonably expect your employees to portray your companies public image, and this can be abused

My own experience has seen me told to keep certain ideas to myself while others talked about their own issues, since they were PC. I've been pressured to wear a diversity pin, participate in "walk for diversity" on Saturday [my day off] and even give money to a charity I oppose, implying refusing would make me a poor team player, and thus get a bad review. You are lucky you are boss

[jboyko3]

I don't know where it was you worked at, but I can assure you that if you were forced or even coerced into volunteering your time without pay on your day off under threat of reprimand, or giving money to a cause you might not support, you should have contacted a lawyer immediately. Or at the very least contacted your states labor board. With a lawyer you may have ended up with a fairly lucrative settlement. With the labor board, you might have at least sparked an investigation. Its called ethics

[rolfocale]

Excellent funny eye catching and makes its points concisely. Kudos

[MyFreedomChannel]

Great video! Thanks for sharing!

[GaGirlie777]

You are so right. Here is a related video that you might find interesting.

/watch?v=54CdvB6JYNU

Get the word out to Moms and Dads across the country.

[jboyko3]

I agree that there are reasonable restrictions that need to be in place in order to run an efficient business. And yes you can't as an employer place restrictions on what people do on their own time. The reason I used the voting analogy is because most people work 9 to 5 jobs. Will volunteerism be 12hrs, 24,hrs 3 continuous months. The standards are vague. Also employers are still limited. I for instance can't tell someone they may not go to jury duty if it conflicts with their work schedule.

[jboyko3]

I agree that there is a double standard but if you chose to do so you could file a petition with the ACLU explaining your grievance. I'll give you another example. I operate a small business with a dozen employees. Now just because they work for me, does that mean that I can now put anything I want in that contract? Of course not. If I put something in the employee handbook like "All employees who work on election day may not vote." The ACLU would slap a lawsuit on me so fast my head would spin.

[ranger480X]

This is true of course. However what looks one way on paper is often different in actual practice. For example, if I am a cashier at MacDonalds and wish to wear a NAZI pin on my lapel I doubt I would last long, while others are allowed wear pro-gay or diversity pins quite often