Rational Response Debate with Kirk Cameron pt.7
Top Comments
All Comments (1,151)
-
@luvmusic09 I'm a creationist and a christian, but what you said at the start there is not a good argument ;/. Evolutionists make it very clear that the constant changes are noticeable after millions of years, not a couple of thousand. Again I believe that evolution is illogical, but I just wanted to point out that what you said was not a fair argument...
Using your argument, then we should be able to see ourselves getting taller everyday because we grow constantly (which we don't). Takes time.
-
Oh Kirk, cant you see your growing pains were because of transitional evolution?
-
@RCSVirginia Even with EVOLUTION Evidence. youcan never proof theres NO GOD. And you WILL go to Hell if you dont repent. thats a fact. Weather you believe it or not.
-
Kirk Cameron owned this Atheists ...fools...they are fools....
-
@JohnF30Music so what do you call something you can't prove, you can't see, and it is not there......Evolution ...........
-
@luvmusic09 distant past is measured in the 10s of millions of years
-
that was offensive and completely wrong. if you have any questions about reality just ask
-
@kingseho So what about your appendix?!?!?
-
She says we are constantly changing. Where is the change occurring? If we are constantly changing, why do we look like the paintings and sculptures of human beings from the distant past. The operative word is constantly. What arrogant bluffing and posturing. They say every living creature is a transitional form while admitting that there are no fossils showing one kind transitioning into another kind. Then she blabs on about mutations, etc. Transitioning is believed without evidence.
Dealing with Crocoduck-Bananaman-Cameron is almost too much to absorb. It is an overload of ignorance and nonsense from just one poorly-evolved human being.
There is another YouTuber who has already done a terrific job of replying to Kirk. So, I will defer to her in her YouTube video:
"Origin of Stupidity" by ZOMGitsCriss
RCSVirginia 1 month ago 4
@thewayofthemaster Your analogy is fallacious. You claim with microevolution, you "fall back down" to where you were. This is just off the top of my head, but I think, in my opinion, a better way of explain it would be a never ending stairway.
jeremy193 4 months ago 3