Republican Debate on National Security and Defense
Top Comments
All Comments (16)
-
You can sure tell that Obama 's views and the views of those that back him as like Bloomington Indiana city government care not about the defense of in real world view, From Letters of boy cot from Elected memebers to reject a fellow memeber of the league of Common defense rights of self defense to the nut Jobs as like holder backing suiting to Stop the rights of self defense as the maters as with the border Lets not over look the Acts of treason Ie the Guns Walking.
-
You can not both be a fiscal conservative and want to be the world's policeman or build an empire with bases in most of the other nations of the world as we are doing now. Our occupation of other nations is the real reason why so many foreigners hate us and want to attack us. We are propping up the dictators that oppress them! End all foreign aid. US out of UN. UN out of US. Strong defense of the 50 states. Let the Muslims kill each other or better yet, make peace.
-
@migkillertwo - I agree. I don't think the founding fathers ever heard of a nuclear warhead. I'd ten times rather fight them on their soil than here in the streets of America. Ron Paul is just a bit wack-o... and when he said that 911 was our fault, that did it for me. He'll never get elected.
-
@tolynette Neither is unconstitutional pork spending that RP loves to take home to Texas!
Ron Paul 2012! End the perpetual MIC wars before they bankrupt us and bring our troops home! Unconstitutional wars are NOT our heritage!
tolynette 3 months ago 7
People are so wrong on Paul, he is the furthest thing from soft when it comes to security.
With him wars means war. If we are going to fight you, we will do it quickly and mightily. Build weapons, use the weapons, return home, and continue with life. None of this occupation and nation building nonsense. Destroy a declared enemy (by Congress not a President Paul) and win the war.
miacanes5 3 months ago 5