Ken Miller on Intelligent Design
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like theblur's video.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike theblur's video.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add theblur's video to your playlist.
Uploaded on Jan 6, 2006
Ken Miller's talk on Intelligent Design at Case Western University. Ken Miller basically rips Intelligent Design apart in a 2 hour long exposé of the claims of intelligent design and the tactics that creationists employ to get it shoehorned into the American school system.
-
Category
-
License
Standard YouTube License
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
The interactive transcript could not be loaded.
Loading...
Loading...
Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.
Loading...
-
1:29:28
Sugar: The Bitter Truthby UCTV, University of California TelevisionFeatured
3,535,924
-
2:11:52
Does God Exist? (Frank Turek vs Christopher Hitchens)by exposedatheists
397,684 views
-
39:31
A case for Intelligent Design? - The Atheist Experience #660by TheAtheistExperience
83,354 views
-
4:47
Jon Stewart Disproves Intelligent Design in 5 Minutesby AtheismFTW
19,454 views
-
57:37
The Coming Collapse of the Middle Class with Elizabeth Warrenby UCTV, University of California Television
884,066 views
-
171
videos
Play all
Champions of Reasonby Erlinion
-
1:58:42
The Collapse of Intelligent Design - Kenneth R. Miller Lectureby davemark07
1,943 views
-
0:58
Religious Girl Has a Serious Question for Atheist- Think About it!by Monterrey Mixtape Messiah
858,793 views
-
41:18
Neil deGrasse Tyson on intelligent designby The Atheist
10,964 views
-
33:41
Neil deGrasse Tyson: The Perimeter of Ignoranceby MrBrittish
49,720 views
-
Kenneth R. Miller
372 videos15
-
1:08:09
The Great Debate, Part I: Miller & Pennock vs. Dembski & Beheby NatCen4ScienceEd
28,272 views
-
5:01
Derren Brown on 'Intelligent' Designby Free Your Mind
239,063 views
-
1:46:27
Intelligent Design: Waking Up To Creationby dwhite1up
801 views
-
1:58:42
The Collapse of Intelligent Design:Kenneth R. Miller Lectureby Case Western Reserve University
61,938 views
-
52:29
Stanford's Sapolsky On Depression in U.S. (Full Lecture)by Stanford University
398,226 views
-
1:38:28
Einstein's General Theory of Relativity | Lecture 1by Stanford University
964,393 views
-
1:29:30
40/40 Vision Lecture: Neurology and the Passion for Artby UCtelevision
92,189 views
-
1:23:38
Daniel Dennett lecture on "Free Will" (Edinburgh University)by RabidApe
110,511 views
-
41:18
Neil Tyson presentation about intelligent designby Vandré Brunazo
404,366 views
-
57:06
Richard Dawkins - Now Praise Intelligent Designby Atheist Foundation of Australia
170,883 views
-
10:00
10 stupid creationist questions, 10 intelligent answers part 1by RedDevilFFM2
73,256 views
- Loading more suggestions...
Top Comments
HarshColby 2 weeks ago
At least a 100 billion stars in at least a 100 billion galaxies. That's a lot of stars, and plenty of opportunity. I agree. In high school, long, long ago, I did a report on the Drake equation. I got an A.
IDers invent numbers to make their bogus claims sound good. They often exaggerate the odds by pretending evolution is random, or that a complete modern cell is claimed to have been created randomly. It's thoroughly dishonest, but it's all they have.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Gilmaris 4 days ago
"Don't bother to say those are lies unless you can provide documentation - not just such & such a site says so. That movie provides much evidence!"
Such as? Where is Expelled's documentation?
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Video Responses
All Comments (74,957)
37maletero 22 hours ago
Sorry, I could have warned you. Procommenter is a good example of an organism with a harmful, neurological mutation that can survive in nature. Sure, she may not be able to engage in critical thinking - but she excels at skewing the conversation, misinterpreting facts and making baseless assertions.
And really, isn't that all Creationism is?
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
37maletero 22 hours ago
I see our old friend still has plenty of time to Gish gallop, and set up her evolution straw man so she can feel good about knocking it down.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
LoricaLady 1 day ago
No, my analogy was not a strawman but I'm not going to spend a lot of time teaching you the difference. Someone who thinks that science never claims to have absolute answers about anything needs to learn things at a more rudimentary level. I can just see you going up to an airplane pilot and saying, "Do you think this plane can get into the air okay - and then your reaction if he would say 'Well, I don't know because science doesn't have any absolute answers.'"
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
LoricaLady 1 day ago
I never said "If you can't prove it false, then it must be true." What are you cutting and pasting from? I am saying there is EVIDENCE in the fossil record and in the world of nature, and on farms, that evolution is NOT happening and never did happen.
Give one example of evoltluion and defend it. If you can't do that I have no more time for you - like if you keep changing the subject, switch to Bible bashin (never mentioned it), say Read that site or watch that vid, etc. Answer the Qs.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
LoricaLady 1 day ago
Give data to show how "DNA absolutely confirms" evolution. You'll evade that, too, probably. And it doesn't. Once again they use the Correlation Does Not Imply Causation logical fallacy (their fave of many logical fallacies) and say that because there is some similarity it means there is descent. Then they ignore all those cows that stay cows,finches that stay finches,fish that stay fish, bacteria that stay bacteria, in real life and in the fossil record.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
LoricaLady 1 day ago
"Similar" means they are using the Correlation Does Not Imply Causationi logical fallacy. Dolphins-fish, birds-bats-bees, worms-snakes & many other kinds of animals have "similar homology" and "characteristics of". That doesn't prove one came from the other. Animal husbandry DISIPROVES evolution. Animals change alright. ALWAYS within LIMITS.. Cows stay cows. Horses stay horses. Just like in the wild - fish stay fish though there are countless changes & varieties & species.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
LoricaLady 1 day ago
Yes, children do hear about evolution in school at the elementary level. For example there are books in their libraires talking about the anti scientific primal pond theory as an intro to evolution. You say "Evoltuion has yielded resutls in medicine and technology..." Give me one example. You will never do that. You will probably try to change the subject or ignore the Qs. Don't do that. Answer the Qs with real data.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
LoricaLady 1 day ago
You are mistaken. Science does claim to have certain knowledge on many things. Yes there are theories, but there are also LAWS of science.. Airplanes, computers, medical discoveries, etc. etc. etc. are built on them. You assume the sun will come up tomorrow. You speed through traffic counting on laws of gravity and physics and much else to be the same every day.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube