Ken Miller on Intelligent Design

The truth is they want to get these kids before they understand and fill their head with the magic book. THey believe its ok to lie to them in order to save their souls.
Think about it Fundamentalist call atheist immoral. LOL

You know what? My kid is stupid enough. Please don't confuse more her by teaching different theories about the same thing.

mafiaaffee said: You can not teach ID without a creation story.
REPLY of course that is why I ask for the foundation to be proved correct FIRST. They expect every inch of the evloutionary trail to be complete but want to prove none of the bible fairytale.
So if you are going to teach it is science class it think it is reasonable to ask the fools to prove the talking snake and virgin birth.

Also, I ate a very large, spicy lunch, and right about now I'm think a highly skilled designer using a project flow process, especially one with supernatural intelligence, could have designed a much more efficient digestive system. More evidence for my semi-intelligent line process design theory.

Sure ID is the same as Creation. You can not teach ID without a creation story. I mean what you wanna say to the children. An intelligent agent(for whom we have no evidence) might(we have to use the word "might" because we don´t have any verifiable evidence) created all life and then made it appear like it gradually evolved and to trick us even more he makes life evolve even today. Why? We don´t have any fucking idea but if you don´t believe us you burn forever.

I'm not versed on the science of intelligent design, but I've noticed everyone always mentions AN intelligent designer. What about ideas such as the midichlorians (in Star Wars)? They were millions of microscopic intelligent designers. Also, why did the designer(s) make me so that my embryonic tail disappears, leaving only a tailbone (in the anatomical area where other mammals are lucky enough to have tails) as if for a tease.

arsjth - prove the rape of mary is real

I want my theory of line-process design to be taught in schools then. I believe that each apparent advance in biological complexity came about when beings of somewhat average intelligence added another stage to the process. (Eg. someone looked an acoelomate and said "hmm, a body cavity with a partial or eventually a complete lining would be a good idea") What are the intellingent designists and evolutionists afraid of if my theory of LPD is taught side by side with theirs in school?

arsjth - said ID is a science
REPLY LOL well it is based on the bible so prove the bible -- prove the talking snake and virgin birth

"Intelligent design is a theory that has credible reasons to be believed"
ID is not a scientific theory and repeating a lie over and over again doens´t make it true and i believe there are many credible reason to believe the earth is flat, ever tried standing on a ball? But no matter how many credible reason you have it´s simply wrong and we know it´s wrong and that´s why we shouldnt teach neither ID nor flat earth myths in the school.