Joe Rogan- The Stoned Ape Theory

Joe Rogan talking about the Stoned Ape theory and the evolution of Humans. Taken from his The Joe Rogan Experience Podcast #79 with Redban And Jon Lajoie . Very interesting stuff. RIP Terrence McKenna. Shitty editing just put some random pics, more interested in the audio. thanks, ^_^

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Joe
• Rogan
• Mushrooms
• redban
• joe
• lajoie
• the
• rogan
• experience
• podcast
• #79
• ufc
• terrence
• mckenna
• stoned
• ape
• theory
• meat
• eating
• leopards
• monkeys
• chimpanzees
• marijuana
• brian
• development
• Talking
• in
• space
• box
• 360
• black
• ops
• skateboarding
• call
• of
• duty
• ps3

[bigsmurf4]

Anyone who thinks mushrooms or any psychedelic for that matter are "drugs" with no medicinal, therapuetic, or benificial effects is kidding themselves.

The real problem is that most people have no idea of the context of how these substances should be used, and ignorant people take them for the wrong reasons

You mean to tell me that ALL of the civilizations that used psychedelics for spirituality for thousands of years were all a bunch of stoned idiots, BULLSHIT

[MadKid91932]

Joe Rogan got me here.

[GotYourWingsYet]

a fungus could survive in space from a source planet but not develop from comet remains or asteroids, the most these things carried were carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen and oxygen. Yea growing materials FOR proteins, but in no way could a plant or fungi develop in space like that

[Konicava]

Why they interrupt him seriously it needs to be monologues, because those other guys talk stuff I don't care, joe is like "mushrooms are silly, but you know..." then the faggot FUCK interrupts him, what a BULLSHIT!

[SvetYakov333]

@bigsmurf4 As much as i agree, i have to say... All those civilizations were a bunch of stoned idiots.. LMFAO. More was accomplished in the last 200 years, than by anything in the last 2 million. XDD

[ryanruls]

To what he says around 5:27; that isnt rediculous; what's rediculous is that our own kind would try to get rid of something that comes naturally to the planet. Shrooms arent anything new, nor something we know nothing about. Same goes with pot; people have used these things for thousands of years and all of the sudden you come to the conclusion that it's bad. Thats complete bullshit. They(govt) just want everything to benefit themselves. If you dont agree, share your opinion; Id like to hear it.

[vanessa80ist]

sugar is the key, baby!!!

[ralphyetmore]

@coreybuchan21 Again, this question that you ask shows a very deep lack of understanding about what a scientific theory is. The problem with your question is that you don't understand the subject that you're discussing. I urge you to go look up the 7 - 13 different criteria involved in organizing a scientific theory.

[ralphyetmore]

@coreybuchan21 When you confuse unsubstanciated ideas with scientific theories, that's not being "far too specific". That's being careless, irresponsible and uneducated. I've seen many people doing this here, and it has a lot to do with the fact that Joe Rogan does it flipantly. The problem with that is that it's no better then the religious nuts and the people that Rogan seems to bash.

[coreybuchan21]

@ralphyetmore  And what the hell is wrong with science addmiting to a few open ends every now and again instead of throwing there best "theory" at the problem, its sad the people cant live with a few uncertanties in there lives, simple as that

[coreybuchan21]

@ralphyetmore geez dude your being far too specific, sure im talking in simplistic terms but when you consider the changes we make to certain theories over 20, 50 or even 100 years its amazing how many assumptions are thrown in there, im not talking all scientific theory, and im not trying to be specific im simply saying a small assumption can lead you a long way in the wrong direction

[ralphyetmore]

@coreybuchan21 If you actually understood the meaning and criteria that would make something a scientific theory, then you wouldn't be describing it in the way that you did here. I'd suggest looking into the scientific process, the criteria involved in taking something from a hypothesis to a scientific theory, and the perponderence that is need for such theories before attempting to discern thier legitimacy.