Extract of Robert Burns's famous poem in Scots.
See the videos to the bottom left on corrupt lawyers and judges, if you want to know more!
Robbie Burns knows of the power that the poor have and a holy power that the rich dishonest power-driven corrupt will never attain.
Let us give them a small measure of their filthy conduct in and during their lives, fight against (or for) the corrupt with me...JOIN together!
For those who protect the corrupt, write:
honor.the.corrupt.you.protect@gmail.com
Those who watch and hate the corrupt COMMENT or write to any of these and do a little more
Fight.the.Corrupt@gmail.com
Investigate.the.Corrupt@gmail.com
Indict.the.Corrupt@gmail.com
Prosecute.the.Corrupt@gmail.com
Incarcerate.the.Corrupt@gmail.com
Write and ask and get the rest of Robbie's rant against the establishment or even
with what you can do to spread this Gospel message that evil falls to the good who stand and fight.
omeone suggested I am impugning lawyers.
O
"... Respondent's argument clearly demonstrates his failure to understand that the right to be heard is not limited to only being heard in person. The right is preserved by permitting a party to submit his or her position in writing." [Extract from: Paragraph 72, Report of Referee].
IndictTheCorrupt 5 years ago
TThose who are rendered mute and senseless when confronted with these statements from a Ruling of Referee in the Supreme Court of Florida are indeed HEREBY impugned as non-professionals!
IndictTheCorrupt 5 years ago
So lawyers defend these two sentences as universal American truths or if not true, defend your profession and state that true open hearings are necessary in most every area of state civil and criminal (the more so) law.
IndictTheCorrupt 5 years ago
D
But no lawyer will discuss this and we so far have a second year law student commenting boldly but without any referenced basis other than his high position as a junior law student. Not sufficient, but case law showing this to be true in at least one particular case (and again appeals are subsequent procedures after losing at trial or is at "reading" and there is no right to be heard in open court a second time!).
IndictTheCorrupt 5 years ago
Such case law would be a nice start depending upon what it really established as a matter of federal constitutional law in the areas of due process and equal protection.
IndictTheCorrupt 5 years ago