Freeman Dyson on Global Warming 1of2 Bogus Climate Models

A prominent scientist who's followed the science of global warming from the beginning, Dyson explains why climate models have no scientific merit, why average global ground temperature is a great fiction, and what he believes the real dangers of increased CO2 in the atmosphere are. He suggests that the relatively simple solution of land use management could potentially give us the ability to control the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere at any level we'd like, and there's no need to stop burning coal and oil.

From http://peoplesarchive.com/browse/movi...

• Category

  News & Politics

[Al Smithee]

He focuses on statistical analysis of the real world not the output of computer models. If you observe the real world and examine the historical records( ice cores, ect) the more skeptical you become. The AGWs try to end debate by questioning the integrity of the Skeptics(whom the call Deniers)fail toconsiderthatthere can be shills on their side of the issue because Alarming results generate more research funding than admitting there are uncontrollable variables, such as solar cycles, involved.

[RadioCanadaZero]

All the CO2 taxes should be null and void and an investigation should done about the organized financing of the so called "consensus" through grants

[Cristobal Colon]

that prooves that "propaganda" is stronger than truth...trust on the ones you know are honest and forget AlGore lies...

[1000frolly]

".....a dozen bulletproof lines of evidence.".

Name ONE.

[Kyle Towers]

YOU need to support that wild claim. But then didn't bother to support your claim that Rutan destroyed CAGW either, even though I specifically asked for the argument that did so. Sp far, ypu appear to be a big fan of the bare assertion fallacy. Put up or shut up.

[Kyle Towers]

The 31000 signatures is hilarious; ypu have to know how thoroughly that's been destroyed. I'm not chasing down your vid. I know that the majprity of the tiny minority only quibble with certain specific predictions. Of course, unlike your 31000 idiocy, I'm referring to actual climate researchers. There is and has been for years nearly bulletproof evidence of human CO2 induced climate change at a sensitivity of ~3%. I know the science. You claim there's NOTHING

[HHRRRRGHHNNNHHHKKRR]

In part 2 of this interview Dyson says that the stratospheric cooling is a real problem and it should be solved.

He proposes that we should increase land mass by growing more vegetation, which absorbs CO2, which I think makes a lot of sense. Much more than carbon tax, since that's not even going to reduce the amount of carbon in the atmosphere and it will cost a lot of money.

[1000frolly]

Dyson is correct.

CO2 only really matters for the first 20ppm; we are now at 396ppm, adding more does, essentially, nothing.

The IPCC and their computer models are wrong - its easy to show this, as they have never ever been right about anything.

What we need to do about our "carbon footprint" is? - NOTHING AT ALL.

End of drama.

[HHRRRRGHHNNNHHHKKRR]

But it's known that carbon absorbs heat and cools the stratosphere, so the amount of carbon in the atmosphere matters. Why do you think it doesn't? Freeman Dyson thinks it does, he just thinks it's over-exaggerated, and I agree with that.

idk how you got to skeptical science, with me it went to wiley online library..

[1000frolly]

The link took me to skeptical science, a website run by a cartoonist, John Cook from his home in Brisbane.

I also went to the "Peer reviewed Study".

Its the biggest load of tripe I've ever read; but because it supports the AGW scare it got funded and passed peer review, this is the world we now live in, one of fiction, hysteria, anti-scientific clap-trap, lies & spin.