Residential Water Fuel Cell Energy System (1 of 2)
Uploader Comments (mattimber)
All Comments (32)
-
friend has to send me the design of this project via email?
-
This is not a good path for the future. The cost is too high and the energy to make all of these parts will never be able to be collected off of it.
Energy to make > the energy you will get out.
Keep it simple. Solar to small battery array to a Hoffman Electrolysis Fuel Cell, store the hydrogen with lithium 6 or in tanks, vent off oxygen, use a Hydrogen battery to make electricity.
Cheap and simple.
-
who is marsha love to chat with her
-
Entropy owns you
-
It'd this system works that's awesome. It would allow for electricity to reach places completely off the grid. I'm confused though, where does the initial energy input coming from? Electrolysis of water requires a large amount of energy. Also, as Firewater already brought up, how exactly are you combusting an ionized gas? Moreover, wouldn't it require a very large input of energy to ionize the hydroxy gas? How do you keep this high energy gas from simply reigniting early?
-
Even with a WFC with no pulse width modulation, you can still realize a net gain in energy output in the form of heat from the burning of the HHO gas. It's jsut a matter of coming up with a good heat exchanger, and it looks like cooper is the key, jsut keep the flame from touching it.
We're not only talking about an ionized plasma, it's a composisiton of diatomic & monatomic hydrogen and oxygen. (listen to George Wiseman's description). You have to explain the net gain in energy & ZPE is it!
-
Meyers WFC was nothing to do with energy from the vacuum you said it yourself it was the EEC, think about it if you burn of electrons from oxygen it is no longer an atom as such, it is an ion, hydrogen can not bond with an ion due to electrical charge imbalance, (they are both positive at this point) hence the water molecule is dissociated, at least thats my understanding of it good theory though Matt
LET THEM KNOW WITH A FAX
If you think that clean energy should be the primary issue regarding future investments & job creation, then let our leaders know with a fax!
The Orion Project has set up a way for you to fax YOUR representatives, senators & the President about Energy-Related Issues.
Please Google: "Orion Project Fax"
Comments on YouTube are great, but sending a fax to your leaders is much more effective.
mattimber 2 years ago
Ive come to realize that a cavitation heater driven by a QT isn't that efficient & it's costly. An HHO heater might work if a good intermediary material is found that wont vaporize. For ZPE electric generation, many emerging technologies are about to hit the market. These are pulse motors similar in design to the Bedini Motor (e.g. Millennial Motor and TWM Motor). The stirling engine on the solar dish can be replaced with a thermoacoustic resonator
watch?v=Ro6f_nmJh0E&feature=channel_page
mattimber 3 years ago
A few major problems with this.
Stirlings, Hydrosonic pumps, motors, gearings are NOISY, SQUEEKY, LEAKY and unpredictable shits, these mechanical things wear off and require maintenable and oversight, not good for long time residental use, sorry this a wrong way to do this.
You need everything SOLID STATE, non-mechanical, non-gas phase, not noisy moving parts that break and fail etc.
But nice job with designs, planning and all.
atlanticus 3 years ago
I agree. I made this over a year ago. It was to illustrate a few different over-unity devices & show in one unit. Solid state is much better, but you can still have moving parts and keep it reliable. Id ditch the Quasiturbine and use a Bedini/Newman/Brandt motor to turn the cavitation heater, and/or also supply energy. The newest version of the Papp engine is also a better idea. The water fuel cell is better suited for water purification or to run a car on.
mattimber 3 years ago