Re; DEFENDING THE ELLIOTT ARGUMENT PT1(2/2)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
424 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 19, 2011

At the time I of this typing (which was literally just as I'm about to upload it) Youtube User fivethirty has set the video I was debunking to private (a fact I noticed as I was trying to get a screencap of an annotation I was reading out loud) but has uploaded another video with the exact sakme title. Maybe he was simply unhappy with the editing, I dunno.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (dechha1981)

  • I honestly think he's a troll. I dont think he ever cares about being logical. Like Shock, he will just strong-hold the debate as long as he could & claim victory not realizing his arguments failed. I dont see the point in talking to people like this.

  • @88Keyz101

    Agreed.

  • Elliott is hilariously stupid. Even NephilimFree would say that this guy needs to get a grip on reality!

    I watched a text-chat "debate" -- He typed all-caps the whole time, saying stuff like, "ANSWER DADDYS QUESTION FUCK BOI !!!!!!!"

    He claimed he couldn't do voice-debate because he does not have a cam or mic. Then a couple days ago, he made a new video... In comments, someone challenged him to debate, but Elliott could not because he "does not have cam or mic."

    DERP!

  • @TheHogTieChamp

    I saw the comments section of the video I was debunking. The all caps thing is why I decided to not even bother leaving a comment and just made a video response.

  • Dechha, the guy is an idiot - how do manage to have patience with these clowns?

  • @sparrow111260

    Sheer Stubbournness.

Video Responses

This video is a response to Re; DEFENDING THE ELLIOTT ARGUMENT PT1(1/2)
see all

All Comments (18)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Every theist and atheist is wrong. Problem solved.

  • I CHALLENGE YOU TO A LIVE ONE A ONE DEBATE

  • "Somethuing from Nothing" is not, never was and never will be argued by real physicists (which I am, btw...). My "defect" in that arena is I argue over what the something at T=0 WAS, not that it existed. What IS supposed to be "nothing" at T=0 is our KNOWLEDGE of what there was and what state it had (as in spin, charge, etc).

  • Where are his arguments for Christianity? Just for the sake of patience, we could concede that there is somehow a god somewhere. Great, so how do we determine that is Yeweh and not the deist or pantheist god, or any number of them, or that there is a finite number?

  • Sigh.

    It is painful to watch this clown badly plagiarize William Lane Craig's already bad arguments.

  • So, we are not going to see how AK's mind did the trick of mutating "uncaused cause" into "The Uncreated Creator"?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more