McChrystal called to DC to explain Rolling Stone

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
11,564
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 22, 2010

The top U.S. commander in Afghanistan has been called back to Washington to explain controversial comments he and his aides made for a Rolling Stone magazine article. In the article, the general and his subordinates mock several officials in the Obama administration, including the Vice President and the National Security Adviser. The apology comes just before a US Congress gathering to discuss the budget report from Afghanistan.

  • likes, 9 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (272)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @brasteen1 Thank you my friend and I can not argue with your assessment either.

  • @SACCopE7 I respect all of you guys man obamas a fucking moron and this dude shizzy35 is a piece of shit

  • @mengwise36 obama gonna spend more trust me and please stop blaming for everything there were a lot of things to the economic downturn not just bush. I dont praise him but he doesnt deserve the blame for everything and obamas not a savior. Hes not a savior like he was made out to be. In other words he sucks

  • @mengwise36 youre really dumb thats over 8 years moron what do you expect it not to go up since it has always been going up. obama spent nearly a quarter of that in a year. divide 8 by 4.35 bush spent roughly 2 trillion a term. obama already spent that in half a term and is probaly going spend more than bush spent in total in one term and you say I need math help

  • @blownone1

    Stupid one admiring stupid two eh? You assholes are laughable. The so called fact are spewed from Rush's mouth no? How else do you explain the FACT that you don't know the difference between budget and national debt? Or the FACT that you think the crash of 2008 was due to 2 year of Democratic control of the house? Or the FACT that you think Obama spent 3 times more money in his first 1 and half years than Bush in 8 year? Mathematics and numbers are fact, your opinion is NOT!

  • @blownone1

    Speaking of dumb as a box of rocks, you need to learn how to read, and then comprehend. If you are white, you might be able to claim that you represent a majority of the people. Being a minority, you can't. That is the definition of minority.

    BTW, listening to Rush and read Malkin is NOT research. It is voluntary brain washing.

  • @brasteen1

    If you really think that the economy was all fine and dandy before 2006 and then crashed in 2008 because the Democrats rule the house for 2 years, you are dumber than a sack of rocks. Any economical even takes a LONG time to swing one way or the other. The dot com crash of 2001 was not Bush's or the GOP controlled congress' fault. It was due to over capitalization of the tech sector.

  • @brasteen1

    One is the budget, which is what you use to measure the size of government. One is national debt, which is what you use to measure how much under water we are right now. Two things. Bush, with his GOP controlled congress, increase the budget every year. The part that can't be covered by tax goes to national debt. That is why the budge increased by 1 Trillion over 6 years, the national debt increased by 4.35 Trillion over 8 years.

    So far, Bush is still the bigger spender!

  • @brasteen1

    Let's not confuse ourselves here. Clinton inherited a national debt of 4,064,620,655,521.66 when he went into office. Bush inherited a national debt of 5,674,178,209,886.86 when he got to the White House. That is 1.6 Trillion or 25% increase over 8 years. Obama inherited a national debt of 10,024,724,896,912.49. That is 4.35 Trillion or 77% increase over 8 years. During his first year, the debt gone up to 11,909,829,003,511.75. That is 1.9 Trillion. Nowhere near 4.35 Trillion

  • @shizzy35 Oh and the reason we lost the election is A) PBO is a world class liar and fooled many good Americans into falling for his load of horse shit. B) And also because Bush was an idiot and McCain is a left leaning democrat hack in republican clothing and would probably be worse than barry as president. And as a side note to your leftist anti military rant, my loyaty is not to any man but to this great nation and the Constitution. So get over yourself and get a life moron...

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more