Spiderman 1 2 3
Top Comments
All Comments (29)
-
Spiderman 1 was good. Connected plotline.
2 wasn't bad, but it had almost nothing to do with the main trilogy storyline (and it was cheesy). Octopus is unrelated to goblin. Mary-Jane's a jerk, getting engaged to a gross navy guy just like that. Unlike her. And they put MJ in a wedding dress?
3 is involved, but awesome. I show my friends 3 even if they haven't seen 2. I just say Harry & MJ find out Peter is Spiderman in 2.
Plus, James Franco (Harry) is HOT in 3.
1 is best. 3 is my favorite.
-
cuz the writers thought it would be cool to add more drama and make it confusing and have less venom appearances and make it horrible.
-
Ah the first 2 spiderman movies were so good, why did 3 have to suck so much.
-
wat is the 1st commercal music called
-
bolics
-
its write in the face
EDIT ON THE WINDOWS MOVIE MAKER
-
that was a complete waist of time you didnt even edit it its just the trailers that propper profecinals made all u did was run em together fag
-
Pathetic, you've done nothing. You've copied from the original trailers and haven't credited it, you've used windows movie maker, which is for amateurs and on top of it, you used a terrible olf film/grey scale effect. Enough already with copying, why not make your own stuff.
"My Remake"
That was pathetic. You actualy expect people to believe you did that???!!! You took the trailor for each one and ran them together.
TheNewFiyinite7 4 years ago 4
i think you over used the grayscale effect on wondows movie maker when u made this
11Nadz11 4 years ago 2