Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Steve Gill Suggests Julian Assange be Declared a Terrorist.

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
913 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 30, 2010

The story ran on Nashville's WSMV channel 4 on Nov. 29, 2010.

The White House said it may try to jail those behind the online leaks of sensitive and classified information, but a national talk radio host said that doesn't go far enough. He wants the founder of WikiLeaks captured or killed as being terrorist.

Follow Steve on:
Facebook @ http://www.facebook.com/stevegillshow
Twitter @ http://twitter.com/SteveGillShow
Online @ http://gillreport.com

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 14 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (30)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • idiot

  • Pathetic.

  • typical under-educated southern reactionary zealot ........ no surprises there.

  • @Alxnde Exactly. You can't fight extremists with moderate means. You will lose. The more extreme they get, the more extreme we are going to get.

    It reminds me of that famous quote, "Don't come to a gun fight with a knife."

  • People who oppose wikileaks are complete corporate fat-cat crones that sit behind a wall of ignorance. Murdering someone who fights for an open and honest government is exactly what those asshats want. They are inhuman, anti-American, pro-establishment, right-wing, idiots. If anyone should get locked up, it is them.

  • That's how it seems to me. it's dangerous.there are calls for brutal acts on wikileaks, it encourages that attitude, leaving people willing to do such things in other walks, and that endangers all. Skip the drama. Don't prove to us how much of a patriot you are by the ridiculously drastic measures you are supposedly willing to take for your country. Leaders once confident, now must by wary. Once thought isolated, this brutality returns. And I speak for sake of our leaders. To what repayment?

  • this attitude of crossing the lines, speaking these brutish things, is driving our thinking to radical extremes. That's how it seems to me anyway. it's dangerous.

  • Maybe the people who committed the crimes or wrongdoing or just plain BS outlined in the documents should THINK TWICE BFEORE DOING THAT AGAIN?? Maybe this'll be a wakeup call that they can't just get away with doing whatever they want? That actions have consequences? THAT should be the lesson here. I'm sorry that Hilary has to be a little more careful in her words and how she uses diplomats and shit, but tough shit, Secretary. What goes around comes around.

  • I'm not gonna go to war in Iran for Saudi Arabia. fuck that. The saudi monarchs can kiss my ass.

  • And last but not least, it may not be a CRIME for Saudi Arabia to say, "Hey, Americans, how about you get tough on Iran? We're afraid of them getting the bomb", but it sure as hell is pretty revealing no? Revealing that we're trying to prevent Iran from getting the bomb for ANOTHER COUNTRY'S sake, esp. Saudi Arabia. Fuck em! Let Saudi Arabia's gov't handle its own shit. They got oil and tons of revenue, don't they? They could easily afford a fairly large military to combat Iran's possible nukes

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more