HOAX***Manchester UFO May 2010 from Two Angles***HOAX

Corroborating camera angles... One from a car and one from a helicopter. Video has been acknowledged as a hoax

Category:

Education

Tags:

• UFO
• Manchester

[alokinzna]

I can see with my bare eyes that the "ship" is not twitching together with the rest of the video ...

Seriously , theres no need for analysis or some other shit , you can SEE IT with your BARE EYES .

[tactrdfreak]

A complete and total hoax and if you can't see why then get some coke bottles, cut the bottoms out and use them for lenses. lol

[Montreal1953]

@theInterzone

★★★★★ HOAXES & FEEBLE MINDS

I know, you want to believe, but I am not the author of the Hoax...

Send all questions, comments and hate mail to: BlackHelicopters85@gmail.com. Thanks!

- Manchester UFO hoax.

watch?v=xNRFyzAMEEI

..............................­..............

★ See my default video and all my Madmod (72kyros) favorites. All the clues for approaching the realities with a "lucide mind", are waiting for your appreciation...

[theInterzone]

@Montreal1953 ... @Montreal1953 ...

That's not a proof, that's an unsubstantiated claim.

What project was that? What university? Were there any other people involved in the project? What did the fellow students think about the project? Can we see a "making of" it, or is Pimmjimm's "i did it!" claim all you have to offer in terms of proof?

[Montreal1953]

@edson333 ★★★★★ HOAXES & FEEBLE MINDS

It was a project for university... Here is the Proof :

- Manchester UFO hoax.

watch?v=xNRFyzAMEEI

[edson333]

@Montreal1953 i dont think so, watch 0:43, that is very dificult to do in a 3d software

[Montreal1953]

@alansdalek ★★★★★ HOAXES & FEEBLE MINDS

I am not interested to talk about the motives of the Hoaxer, nor why he probably have more than one Youtube account.

See for yourself, and do all the steps I followed to easily prove the Hoax...

See my answers @phorptical (Part. 1 & 2) and so on...

PS. Usually, bad Hoaxes attract feeble and insecure minds...

[alansdalek]

@Montreal1953 Its nothing Personal but i really do think you are wrong on this occasion, the two pieces of footage tally up with the locations..would a hoaxer go to all that bother just to make sure that the 2 films could be linked..? and rent a helicopter to make it all the more convincing, i dont think so...i think what you have here is a very real object filmed from 2 locations by 2 different people at almost the same time..i would love more clips of this to turn up..

[phorptical]

@Montreal1953 I appreciate the "why" explanation. I am not saying you are wrong, I am just saying I can't see the anomalies you are talking about. And I did look at the specific portions of the video you are referring to. I wish I had a better program to use to analyze videos. Maybe you are more of a forensic expert when it comes to videos that I, lol. But I do appreciate any and all debate! Did you see the recent video from STS 132? If so, what's your take on it?

[Montreal1953]

@phorptical

COMPUTER-GENERATED IMAGERY (CGI) HOAX

You asked me to explain why I believe this is a HOAX.

I did it adequately and rationally, I told you how you could do it and see for yourself. But you don't even dare to follow the steps I showed you as an IRREFUTABLE PROOF...

Now, re-read me, I have never asked you to label this, as a HOAX... But as a youtuber, I openly gave my opinion and you requested the "why"...