Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Most distant object in universe

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
272,863
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 15, 2009

Read more: http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17035

More NS videos: http://www.newscientist.com/projects/misc/video

Astronomers have spotted the afterglow of a self-destructing star 13.1 billion light years from Earth.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 46 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • FINALLY THEY CAUGHT MY FART ON YOUTUBE

  • WTF i was watching minecraft

see all

All Comments (1,320)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Evolutionist crap. Always need millions of years to push their religion.

  • 0:16 so THATS were vegeta's galick gun ended up!

    hmmm i wonder where all those kamehameha waves ended up 0_o

  • @NickMinaj69

    Search for "hypervelocity star" and you'll find lots of material. In particular, there'll be a hit on hubblesite for "Hyperfast Star Was Booted from Milky Way" about a star designated HE 0437-5439. You may also be interested in a search for "intergalactic globular cluster" -- entire globular clusters that roam between the galaxies. NGC 2419 *may* be one, in fact (there is some doubt).

  • @pseudorandomly I wasn't following the conversation, just read this one comment. Do you know the name or where I can find further information about the lone star in the Local Group? I'm curious, I've never heard of this before, I'd love to know more.

  • @NickMinaj69

    You are mostly correct, but not completely. Galaxy collisions can draw out long tidal tails, from which it is possible that individual stars could escape altogether. In addition, it is *known* that stars can be ejected from a galaxy by gravitational interactions near the core; not only is this possible in theory, but we have observations of at least one such runaway star in the Local Group that belongs to no galaxy.

  • @NickMinaj69

    I'm not sure you're following the point of the conversation we were having. The OP was confused about "object", "galaxy", and "supernova" in some manner that I was unable to fully understand. I was postulating an isolated star in an attempt to figure out the source of his confusion.

  • @pseudorandomly The only starts "not in galaxies" are globular clustarts, which exist in galaxy halo's. Which are in the vicinity of galaxies, but a star just sitting in space, not orbiting a galaxy, is non-existant

  • @pseudorandomly Because stars do not exist if not in part of galaxies. The only way to be formed is by the compaction of molecular clouds (which only exist in galaxies) and once they are formed, they are trapped by the gravity of the massive black hole in the center.

  • I just got fully erectile.

View all Comments »
Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more