Shaolin Kung Fu vs Taekwondo

nope MMA fighters would literally kill that monk

mma fighters only know brutal force and grapples unlike this monk here. he is wayy too fast for them to even land a single hit

@xisayg yep cause bj penn is so slow
wow
this monk would get raped
hes like 5'4

@appppppppple your a dumbass, go ahead and put an mma fighter in there. they will trully be shitting their pants

I just noticed that 1:10 he does those 3 incredible kicks in about 1 second

Agreed. People assume that Kung Fu stylists can't fight properly, but only because they've seen it in films or taken wushu lessons which is basically dancing around compared to this guy. I'm impressed by his reaction times when defending. Shows he is extremely alert and fast.

I've never heard of that kind of wushu. I've heard wushu is not a good fighting art, but in this case, that style seems to be invincible. Excellent defence and energy saving. The TKD will tire out from jumping and stepping too much

Wushu is what is used in the movies, this is from the original art form of kung fu. Not to take anything away from wushu, wing tchung is more lethal and requires less time to learn, but comes from the same school of art. That is the Shaolin temple.

I had a feeling that the older shaolin styles were much more practical than modern wushu, as people used it for defence in real life, and it worked. I agree with you on wing chun. I'm learning Hung Gar, seems very powerful, though harder to learn than Wing Chun. Hung has deep stances and intense muscle and pain tolerance training. still, it will take me about 5 years of Hung to be on a par with a 1 year Wing Chun practicer, as Hung is broader, covers many things, even ground fighing i think.

Very nice, I truly believe if your Chi is in line, then regardless of the MA you use, you will be very difficult to over come. I choose wing tchung for it's simplicity, and us it as a way of living. The philosophy is very true to life. The best path is usually the shortest and simplest to use.