Casey Luskin Liar, Hypocrite, Imbecilic Assclown

natural thing is to tire protecting your country, but hiv is created in a lab as well as h1n1. That is only fact here. I don't know who made them but they aren't natural. They are mix of different viruses.
Paranoid? After what I get from your country? I'm not paranoid as should be. BTW they synthesized genome, not created life only change it.

Well, you've made some pretty damn fantastical claims now haven't you? What kind of evidence do you have? (giggles in anticipation)

You do realize that HIV broke out LONG before we had anything near to the genetic capabilities we have now, don't you? There's a 25 year gap there. Furthermore, we've traced the origins of HIV to SIV in apes in Africa. SHIV was created by mixing HIV and SIV but that is specifically under controlled use in research to generate data for a cure.

african HIV-2 USA and europe HIV-1 tips. not the same one. what is the point to give any more if you don't wont to admit that hiv isn't natural.
DR Kongo 1959
St. Luisu 1969
europe 1976
The worldwide epidemic of HIV and AIDS is caused by HIV-1 while HIV-2 is mostly restricted to west Africa.

Of course there are different strains. Sheesh!

Considering the very fast rate of mutation HIV exhibits, it's actually quite an expected outcome that specific strains appear geographically separate.

Of course HIV isn't natural to Humans! It only recently jumped from apes(SIV) to Humans(HIV). And there's genetic evidence that SIV jumped from from another species of simian to apes prior to our zoonotic event with them. Evolutionarily speaking, HIV is a mutated SIV and is indeed new to us.

ok. let's live that there. :)

evolution
All organisms on Earth are descended from a common ancestor or ancestral gene pool.
Despite the uncertainty on how life began, it is generally accepted that prokaryotes inhabited the Earth from approximately 34 billion years ago.
to create prokaryotes from scratch and make it a live, mathematically that is same as tornado flu try car dump and make Ferrari that work. I'm not biologist I'm Mathematician. Evo. vs Creo. have just a theory to suport them.

"mathematically that is same as tornado flu try car dump and make Ferrari that work."

Wow, so your not a biologist but you like to make naive sweeping statements regarding biological origins? Furthermore, half of your statement above is plagiarized.

Should we also pull some arbitrary numbers out of our asses to describe the odds of a creative deity being responsible for life? What's good for the goose should be good for the gander, correct?

What's good for the goose should be good for the gander, correct?
I don't understand. English isn't my first language.
And my statement is almost all copied from net. I can't explain with my words if I must track for half of words in dictionary.
I just give up...

What that statement means is that if you can subscribe to arbitrary numbers being generated to disprove abiogenesis then we should be able to apply that very technique to a creator deity. In that case, the odds are in favor of abio...

i want to say that evo and creo theories have big holes. I'm think that if we combine this two with each other it will be closer to real deal. people engage in this story are easy to exclude each other. We are just scratch the history of world, but we already talk like we know all. I mean about everything...

"if we combine this two with each other it will be closer to real deal"

Not a chance. Regardless, any "holes" you may perceive in evolution are merely gaps in your (our) current knowledge, nothing more.

"but we already talk like we know all."

Creationism, yes. Science, no. There will always be more to learn.