Žižek on What Philosophy really is ...

Žižek on what Philosophy really is

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Žižek
• Philosophy
• Theory

[JerseyFinch]

Hegel's what? Suitor? Looter?

[absinth1987]

@JerseyFinch Hegel's Luther

[loztallis]

@cdeization Wow, you're so right. You really know a lot about this don't you.You must have read a lot of philosophy.

[roryphelan]

Thanks for the post. Is the rest of this lecture available? Do you know where I could find it?

[featheon]

@pawsoned No, both are influenced by the dialectic. Derrida talks about the trace and Zizek talks about the negation. It has to do with Hegel's shared influence, not Derrida being suppressed by Zizek.

[absinth1987]

@AddictedToAndrea what ist so called analytical philosophy? Start read Hegel, do something more substantial then analytical philosophy

[absinth1987]

@Muaver sorry, but this is the wrong answer

[arizona89]

@Muaver you really must hate yourself...

[pawsoned]

@Muaver Oh yeah, that's pretty much my impression too, the more I read Zizek the more I think about Derridean method of deconstructing a view by reversing its sense. I think it's one of Zizek's methods as well, although he overtly disavows himself from any kind of post-modern or post-structural affinity. Compare e.g. Deluzian concept of bodies without organs and Zizek's book about Deleuze called "Organs without bodies". So yeah I would say that he is much influenced by the thing he is opposed to

[Muaver]

@pawsoned he's not elusive at all, he's opposed to (and thereby influenced by) post-modernism and applies lacanian theory to marxism, which is very much based on hegel

[Muaver]

@arizona89 fuck off