Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

What Happened to Laci Green?!

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
4,845
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 30, 2009

Nothing worse than a lying fraudster, than someone who sucks up to a lying fraudster in an attempt to elevate herself above others.

People like Thunderf00t, dprjones, lordhathor and terrarising have spoken out against the actions of VFX, with carefully made videos. Laci, in calling him a strong, respectable person with admirable qualities makes her two things: a sell-out, and a fake.

Laci's "invitation": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0KLwaud4Ic&feature=related
Her first debate video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qp63RKTF2HY
VFX response: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fAJPQtbhnY&feature=channel_page

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 100 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Just because Venom was a jerk doesn't mean you have to down Laci. How does it make her a "sell-out" or a "fake" because she doesn't care to be negative person? Is she supposed to be aggressive all the time?

  • @ThePrisonersCinema Am I a misogynist because I believe it is wrong to treat humans bad? She believes it is okay to treat men badly because they are men but if the equal treatment were given to a woman then watch out because she will bite your head off. I believe that humans should not be treated badly and that she is sexist against men. Where I treat every man and woman with the same respect/disrespect they deserve.

see all

All Comments (148)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @wildste So, you think that being pro-male on one issue (in this case, accepting homosexual behavior) automatically equates with being anti-female on the same issue? That's irredeemably sexist of you.

    "And again, HISTORICALLY, women were never allowed to initiate sex." Source, please.

  • @loqutor I would have thought that the fact I mentioned the Greeks and the Romans would have been a hint that I was talking historically. In the past, we have been a lot more excepting of gay men. e.g., the Spartens were apprenticed to an old master at a young age who they were sometimes expected to have a sexual relationship with. It is only in the past 1000 years have we become repressed.

    And again, HISTORICALLY, women were never allowed to initiate sex.

  • @wildste You must be a virgin, because every single str8 man I know would LOVE for women to initiate sex more often.

    And really, gay men have been more accepted than lesbians? What fucking planet do you live on? Gay men experience FAR more hate crimes than lesbians, and far more severe forms of hate crime. A girl labeled a "dyke" in high school will get nasty rumors spread about her and called mean names. A boy labeled a "fag" will be treated like a circus freak, and become a punching bag.

  • @loqutor OK. there is a HUGE difference between having sex and allowing women to experience sex on their own terms. In terms of sex, for the mans POV, women were only good for having babies. And it was mainly from the man saying so. How often were women themselves allowed to dictate when they were going to have sex and for pleasure?

    And as for male sexuality, we were a lot more excepting of gay men then we were of gay women (Greeks and Romans being good examples)

  • @wildste We have? That is a gigantic load of horse shit. First of all, male sexuality has been every bit as repressed. Secondly, if you're really trying to convince me that there is a single heterosexual man alive (and they make up the majority of men out there) who wants women to NOT want sex, then you've completely discredited yourself in the eyes of anybody who does ANY critical thinking instead of just parroting rewarmed feminist dogma.

  • @loqutor I've been watching Sex+ since the start, and she rarely mentions religion in the series. And as for men repressing female sexuality, well from what I have read, we have.

  • @wildste Oh, she bashes religion quite a bit on Sex+. And men. She blames them for repressing women's sexuality, which is a load of crap.

  • @loqutor Everything she does on youtube, so does that include the Sex+ series that she has been running for over two years now that has nothing to do with religion at all and has in actual fact taken over as her main channel?

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more