Wtc 7 fires

This shows the extent of the fires at WTC7. I find the cars interesting also, many of the tires are flat,
To get real answers go here:

http://forums.randi.org/local_links.php?catid=18

The rest of the story

http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/home

Confesions of an extruther you do not have to remain stupid.

http://extruther.blogspot.com/2007/10/truthers-strike-back.html

And a great documentary on the Makers of Loose Change.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7216643725166640147&hl=un

http://montereycountyskeptics.blogspot.com/

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• WTC7
• Bulding
• 9/11
• Fires

[lickdacat2]

THIS BUILDING WAS BROUGHT DOWN TO DESTROY THE EVIDENCE THE SEC HAD ON ENRON, GLOBAL CROSSING AND HUNDREDS OF OTHER WALL STREET FRAUDSTERS.

NOTE IN THE PHOTOS AND VIDEOS WHEN YOU CAN FIND THEM THAT THE 13TH AND 14TH FLOORS WERE BURNING VERY NICELY. THIS WAS DONE TO DESTROY THE EVIDENCE BEFORE THEY PULLED THE BUILDING USING THE NANOTHERMITE PLANTED BY THE ISRAELI MOSSAD.

THEY WANTED THE EVIDENCE GONE FOREVER AS THE ROTHSCHILD BANKING MAFIA HAD QUITE A BIT TO LOSE IF EVIDENCE SURVIVED.

[wheelst]

@lickdacat2 Okay then.  Prove it.

[lcspies]

@sh9683 Hello? the water pressure was low to non existent because of the damage to the water lines from falling debris. Thats why firefighters let it burn because of the lack of water pressure and they were in rescue mode. they let it burn because they knew it was not savable and pulled out of the building. They also knew after a few hours of the fires burning the building was in danger of collapsing from the damage, the building was sagging, and creaking from the stress until it collapsed.

[sh9683]

@lcspies ten floors? lol prove it this shows a few fires that could have EASILY have been controlled, if you still believe those tiny fires where out of control then your just dumb! the firefighters could easily have gotten it under control, heck if the sprinkler system worked (they randomly quite working that day) the fires would have been put out! keep believing what you are told, but video evidence says the contrary!

[lcspies]

@sh9683 Ten floors were on fire and burned uncontrolled for 7 hours.

[lcspies]

@sh9683 Steel did not melt during the fire before the collapses.

[sh9683]

@lcspies hmm i haven't seen many steel building have melting steel like wtc7 did. even with fires 5 times or more hotter then wtc7

[sh9683]

lol fires in what? 10 windows 15 tops out of 47ish stories? and thats how it came down? no freaking way! it was a cd your goal is to prove it wasn't! even the NIST said it free fell for a bit which is absolutely impossible or fires to do that, let alone fires that are covering maybe 10% or less of the tower

[lcspies]

Thats where you are wrong...that is why i said do research to see if the report is accurate or not. You did not even read it or research anything. And what do you think steel is made from? oxidation is iron burning which causes heat. but I guess any report or evidence that does not contain your thermite involvement is erroneous. you claim thermite, from what website/report did you get that from?

[SexyMelon]

HAHA!

"Thomas Aquinas and other theologians (!) remarked on the famous burning property of Iron..."

Okay, that's kinda funny, I don't remember reading that.

But, yes, of course iron burns. Yet somehow steel buildings never catch fire because of it. Jee, who knows...