So when you go to site such as M. Reynolds ( and I recommend you read his Qui Tam case) or you watch researchers such as A Johnson, Fetzer, Killtown ( not too bad) Ace Backer… Ask yourself just one question: Why do they not use the strongest argument and get pictures or videos that show the exit area of 175?
A plane cannot fly through a building like WTC2, not only are there many columns there are also two floors that the plane need to destroy in order to exit the other side Undamaged. Any idiot can see that this does not work. This is also the most easily provable part of the fakery because there is NO HOLE where the nose exits.
What you need to understand is that in the “ no plane” theory there are strong arguments and weak arguments. The first 4 ( and there are more) arguments I listed are weak ones. They are certainly interesting but they are only an appetizer, the main course is the nose out.
Ok, I’ve decided to explain a few things to you. First of all I went to your you tube page and I saw that you have quite a few videos of flight 175. I am assuming that you are aware of all of the video ( or what ever it was) abnormalities: no sound, the disappearing wing, wings entering the WTC2, no deceleration... And most important of all the nose coming out.
Alex Jones claims his friends in NY saw planes. Either they're lying to him or he's lying to us. Take your pick, but there were no planes. I do know that i was banned from his prisonplanet forum for starting a popular thread that encouraged people to watch the Dimitri Khalezov documentary interview. I lost all trust for Alex Jones after that.
@chibangin007 Part 4
So when you go to site such as M. Reynolds ( and I recommend you read his Qui Tam case) or you watch researchers such as A Johnson, Fetzer, Killtown ( not too bad) Ace Backer… Ask yourself just one question: Why do they not use the strongest argument and get pictures or videos that show the exit area of 175?
mikavettel 3 weeks ago
@chibangin007 Part 3
A plane cannot fly through a building like WTC2, not only are there many columns there are also two floors that the plane need to destroy in order to exit the other side Undamaged. Any idiot can see that this does not work. This is also the most easily provable part of the fakery because there is NO HOLE where the nose exits.
mikavettel 3 weeks ago
@chibangin007 Part2
What you need to understand is that in the “ no plane” theory there are strong arguments and weak arguments. The first 4 ( and there are more) arguments I listed are weak ones. They are certainly interesting but they are only an appetizer, the main course is the nose out.
mikavettel 3 weeks ago
@chibangin007 Part 1
Ok, I’ve decided to explain a few things to you. First of all I went to your you tube page and I saw that you have quite a few videos of flight 175. I am assuming that you are aware of all of the video ( or what ever it was) abnormalities: no sound, the disappearing wing, wings entering the WTC2, no deceleration... And most important of all the nose coming out.
mikavettel 3 weeks ago
@mikavettel shut the fuck up shill
chibangin007 4 weeks ago
@chibangin007Ah I see. it wan't a plane then. So why is there no hole?
mikavettel 4 weeks ago
@mikavettel it wasn't a plane!
chibangin007 4 weeks ago
@mikavettel you're an idiot! you pussies will never understand. fuckin retard!
chibangin007 4 weeks ago
@chibangin007 but your forgetting the best of them all: the plane went through the building and left no hole.
mikavettel 4 weeks ago
Alex Jones claims his friends in NY saw planes. Either they're lying to him or he's lying to us. Take your pick, but there were no planes. I do know that i was banned from his prisonplanet forum for starting a popular thread that encouraged people to watch the Dimitri Khalezov documentary interview. I lost all trust for Alex Jones after that.
anthonyc31 1 month ago in playlist More videos from WelcomeToKilltown