Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Re: A Physics Party Trick that Sucks [Liquid]

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
3,900
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 14, 2008

The candle-goes-out-and-sucks-up-water experiment, and why oxygen loss is NOT the reason why, despite what you may have learned in school.

  • likes, 141 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (shanedk)

  • Ok, I was doing this project for school, and this proved it false. :D So I can say this new thing thanks to you. But, I'm still in a little bit of a problem. I need to find an application for this in real life, but I can't think of any. Anyone wanna help me? Please reply to this comment

  • This concept is very important to firefighters. You know about the fire triangle: heat, fuel, and oxygen. A fire might consume all of the oxygen in the room and go out, with the heat and fuel remaining. As soon as the firefighter opens the door or busts a window, the sudden influx of oxygenated air can start the fire right back up. It's incredibly dangerous and part of their training is dealing with precisely this situation.

Top Comments

  • We have a rebel on our hands, people.

  • I hope it wasn't written by Kent Hovind.

Video Responses

This video is a response to A Physics Party Trick that Sucks [Liquid]
see all

All Comments (65)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Heheh, 3:58.. Hehehe I remember doing this experiment and that was the conclusion I wrote on my paper. I remember the teacher had to clarify for the class that the suction relied upon the cooling of the gas. LOL!

  • You really could have proven that it was volume change because of thermal differences by causing the water level in the glass to go back down by using a hair dryer to re-heat the air in the glass.

  • @Mithcoriel It is the exact same volume. The volume of air within the glass remains constant during the entire process, and the mass does too.

  • You said: "The oxygen is converted into carbon-dioxide. The mass stays the same".

    But it's not the mass that matters, it's the volume. If carbon-dioxide happened to have a much higher density than oxygen, that would still cause it to suck the liquid in. (As it is, of course, that doesn't matter. Just saying.)

  • Question: How many creationists have used this as a reason to question evolution taught in schools?

  • If Hovind were telling the truth about having taught high school science for 15 years, he might well be the subject of that book.

  • No, it was written by somebody who knew what he was talking about.

  • So, whatever became of mooeypoo, anyway?

View all Comments »
Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more