Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Adam Savage From Mythbusters Interviewed by reddit.com - Part 1 of 3

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
111,877
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 2, 2009

Adam Savage from Mythbusters is interviewed by the users of http://reddit.com We asked him the top ten questions voted on by the users in http://science.reddit.com

Transcript here: http://www.reddit.com/r/reddit.com/comments/89vwm/adam_savages_reddit_intervi...

'MYTHBUSTERS' LAUNCHES SEVENTH SEASON WEDNESDAYS AT 9PM
BEGINNING APRIL 8 WITH TWO-HOUR DEMOLITION SPECIAL.
http://www.discovery.com/mythbusters

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 15 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Anyone else just type in "reddit" ?

  • No more drinking episodes? Better drink my own piss.

see all

All Comments (230)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • reddit.com/r/trees/comments/or­qvq/thats_the_reason_why_i_lov­e_smoke_rtrees/

  • Holly shit he is balding as shit!!!

  • @kihhn

    Also the types of reports that NIST and FEMA create are not within the realm of peer review, however they do often contain references to peer reviewed science to make their case.

    The NIST and FEMA reports do not exclusively deal with the science of what occurred, so it's not the jurisdiction of peer review. Perhaps you should google the mechanism of PR so you can acquaint yourself better with what it is and why it is the most reliable standard of truth in the sci community :)

  • @kihhn

    ..That such an event would not be in danger of leaks over time. I mean if the cons are true we're talking about all sorts of US citizens, scientists, technicians, airline officials, demolition experts and so on involved. How do you even begin to approach people to commit the most heinous act perpetrated on US soil? How do you know they'll go along? They won't tell anyone ever? How much do you pay someone for something so horrible? And so many? It's an unbelievable scenario 4 sure.

  • @kihhn

    No, I believe explanations that have evidence on their side. I also find that Occam's razor tends to be a reliable way to discard unreasonable assertions. You see aside from the fact that most of these questions you ask do have perfectly logical explanations, I find the idea of a controlled demolition fantasy because of the shear number of people it would have taken to pull such a thing off and how ANY governing body would be insane to take a risk that such an event (cont)

  • @kihhn

    Really? None? I gave clear answers to a few of them, and you even conceded and then shifted the goal post in your follow up to the first one I answered. I am not beholden to you to answer every one of your questions and although I am not willing to research for you the answers are out there. NOT having answers to these questions though, and assuming therefore it must be a demolition, is akin to a god of the gaps argument (look it up).

  • @vadimcream Why wasn't NISTs or FEMAs report peer-reviewed? And why aren't we able to see how they made their collapse models? Now why is that?

    And you've proven your point how die hard non-truthers would not be satisfied by just about any explanation or proof laid in front of them.

  • @vadimcream You've tackled none of my questions. This is you 'tackling' a question "What appears to B melted steel has been addressed, although since I dont have a photographic memory and dont care to do research 4 u, you can look it up yrself".

  • @kihhn

    Kihhn, I've tackled most of your questions but like I said, I can't do it all for you. You've proved my point though, those that are die hard truthers would not be satisfied by just about any explanation or proof laid in front of them. You keep on shifting the goal post and we could do that forever. If the truthers really did have truth on their side they could publish their findings in a respected peer review journal but as far as I know they haven't even tried. Now why is that?

  • @kihhn

    What appears to B melted steel has been addressed, although since I dont have a photographic memory and dont care to do research 4 u, you can look it up yrself. As 4 the pancake 10 sec theory, its flat out false. Heres a vid that discusses this & shows the real time it took... watch?v=Ft5y0BXOXQk

    Also thermite being used has been throroughly discredited as well by the same video maker in a video you can look up titled "The Termite conspiracy" which has been mirrored a lot on YT.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more