Adam Savage From Mythbusters Interviewed by reddit.com - Part 1 of 3
Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (230)
-
reddit.com/r/trees/comments/or
qvq/thats_the_reason_why_i_lov e_smoke_rtrees/ -
Holly shit he is balding as shit!!!
-
Also the types of reports that NIST and FEMA create are not within the realm of peer review, however they do often contain references to peer reviewed science to make their case.
The NIST and FEMA reports do not exclusively deal with the science of what occurred, so it's not the jurisdiction of peer review. Perhaps you should google the mechanism of PR so you can acquaint yourself better with what it is and why it is the most reliable standard of truth in the sci community :)
-
..That such an event would not be in danger of leaks over time. I mean if the cons are true we're talking about all sorts of US citizens, scientists, technicians, airline officials, demolition experts and so on involved. How do you even begin to approach people to commit the most heinous act perpetrated on US soil? How do you know they'll go along? They won't tell anyone ever? How much do you pay someone for something so horrible? And so many? It's an unbelievable scenario 4 sure.
-
No, I believe explanations that have evidence on their side. I also find that Occam's razor tends to be a reliable way to discard unreasonable assertions. You see aside from the fact that most of these questions you ask do have perfectly logical explanations, I find the idea of a controlled demolition fantasy because of the shear number of people it would have taken to pull such a thing off and how ANY governing body would be insane to take a risk that such an event (cont)
-
Really? None? I gave clear answers to a few of them, and you even conceded and then shifted the goal post in your follow up to the first one I answered. I am not beholden to you to answer every one of your questions and although I am not willing to research for you the answers are out there. NOT having answers to these questions though, and assuming therefore it must be a demolition, is akin to a god of the gaps argument (look it up).
-
@vadimcream Why wasn't NISTs or FEMAs report peer-reviewed? And why aren't we able to see how they made their collapse models? Now why is that?
And you've proven your point how die hard non-truthers would not be satisfied by just about any explanation or proof laid in front of them.
-
@vadimcream You've tackled none of my questions. This is you 'tackling' a question "What appears to B melted steel has been addressed, although since I dont have a photographic memory and dont care to do research 4 u, you can look it up yrself".
-
Kihhn, I've tackled most of your questions but like I said, I can't do it all for you. You've proved my point though, those that are die hard truthers would not be satisfied by just about any explanation or proof laid in front of them. You keep on shifting the goal post and we could do that forever. If the truthers really did have truth on their side they could publish their findings in a respected peer review journal but as far as I know they haven't even tried. Now why is that?
-
What appears to B melted steel has been addressed, although since I dont have a photographic memory and dont care to do research 4 u, you can look it up yrself. As 4 the pancake 10 sec theory, its flat out false. Heres a vid that discusses this & shows the real time it took... watch?v=Ft5y0BXOXQk
Also thermite being used has been throroughly discredited as well by the same video maker in a video you can look up titled "The Termite conspiracy" which has been mirrored a lot on YT.
Anyone else just type in "reddit" ?
xOpT1cAlxL4Z3rx 7 months ago 123
No more drinking episodes? Better drink my own piss.
ChoolyBuzkill 9 months ago 89