Lies swallowed & regurgitated by left gatekeepers: McMurtry

You make the mistake of assuming that some evidence that's contradictory to the "official version" is reliable simply because it varies from government sources. The reports of "6 or 7" of the hijackers still being alive are very suspect in and of themselves as far as I know. Bin Laden's level of involvement (and current state) is still up for debate, but it's important to remember that plenty of the information that's come out since the 9/11 and the ensuing information shitstorm has been false.

If you actually believe members of the real Left are "gatekeepers", than you're an idiot. It would defy what we know about how the media operates, as well as what we know in regards to how this society treats and views the real Left. Not to mention, the real Left doesn't get much play in the mainstream, which would make it pretty fucking hard to "gatekeep" much of anything.
Go read a god damn book!

Read an austrian economics book, and you'll realize it completely destroys anything you thought you knew about economics. The nyou realize how far in the ditch liberals are leading us to. But of course, you'll just ignore that and not try to undersand, it's too complicated to find out the truth, it's much more convenient to think that you know than actually knowing, right?

Yeah, a bunch of worthless libertarians who even Reagan wouldnt appoint (he stuck to supply-siders), also even Hayek admitted Keynes was a good economists

Oh, and keynes was both more reputed and demonstrated than any of those fucks

Does it mean keynes is right? Hardly. All he did was promote bubbles. Keynes is undoubtedly a great economic in the macroeconomics sense. Unfortunately macroeconomics don't work. So i honestly don't care for Keynes. When you take out the trash and moan about how much trash you have and come to the conclusion that you need more bags rather than being less of a pack rat, you're bound to being shortsighted.

No, Occams razor suggests he is probably _more_ right than those austrian dipfucks who go out of their way to politicize economics (of course they claim otherwise)

Doesn't really matter what you think here, you don't seem to have what it takes to pursue this discussion. For if you did, of all the alternatives out there, you wouldn't support any keynesianism. I don't care that you disagree with the austrian view, even the biggest austrian icons disagree with each other. Where i take offense is when you deny the fact bubbles create scarcity and wealth destruction, loss of incentive, financial insecurity through boom and bust cycles. But yea you deny this.

It's a cult. It is anti-intellectualism at its best. Strange having so many "theories" that rely on speculation and hearsay versus scholarship, which relies on sound analysis based on evidence.

-- TRUTHERS ARE SHILLS for ALEX JONES

Hitler said the sky is blue.

-- why couldn't Bush "find" a single WMD in all Iraq but could covertly plant tons of munitions inManhattan to destroy 3WTC bildings?

Its about establishing precedent. The administration probably could have planted WMDs quite easily -- they don't because they want to enlarge the sphere of what they can get away with. Its a disempowering technique.

Its also what I term as "Squid Ink" - it keeps people in a state of controversy about reality in order to allow the squid to ultimately slip away.