Lies swallowed & regurgitated by left gatekeepers: McMurtry

(#3/Snowshoefilms) 9/11 should be recognized as a major turning point in modern history, in western civilization, McMurtry says. It is therefore of great importance that 9/11 be properly understood. The philosopher calls attention to the most prominent left analyst, Noam Chomsky, who is 'normally critical of established official stories,' but holds on to the official conspiracy theory, the 'least plausible conspiracy theory,' despite its many 'gaping holes.' As such, McMurtry notes, left gatekeepers 'are blocking out the same things the official mainstream media and governments are blocking out which is...what in fact went on on 9/11?' The absolute falsity of the official story is undeniable, the McMurtry says. "It's scientifically confirmable; we have evidence for it and we don't have good evidence against it...it's a scientific hypothesis...we can regard as valid.' McMurtry recalls that during the Reagan administration he watched those in power telegraphing their intentions by accusing others of doing what they were doing or planning to do to 'the enemy-of-the-day.' There are real conspiracies, McMurtry says: there has 'in fact been a conspiracy to rule the world, indeed, but whose conspiracy has it been? Who is now ruling the world, and how have they come to do so? So the fact that we get projected onto a conspiracy theory is just another repetition of an ancient operation which is predictable on the part of this regime. A key element in the continuity of anti-communist or anti-terrorist conspiracy is making the public afraid of being called a 'conspiracy theorist' -- telling the truth or even thinking about such matters.
McMurtry touches on some of the gaping holes in the official story, then turns his attention to cui bono, who benefits? In whose interests was it that this crime occurred? [part 2: a structural analysis of why 9/11 happened when it did: the crisis faced by the Bush administration]. This interview was prepared for and played at the Vancouver 9/11 Truth Conference, June 22-24, 2007. John McMurtry, professor of philosophy and university professor emeritus, University of Guelph, is a Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada. His most recent books are Unequal Freedoms: the global market as an ethical system; The Cancer Stage of Capitalism; Value Wars: the global market vs the life economy, and The 9/11 Conspiracy: the scamming of America (James Fetzer, ed.). snowshoefilms yoryevrah

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• McMurtry
• Chomsky
• 9/11
• projection
• conspiracy
• theory
• gatekeepers
• inside
• job
• Guelph
• collective
• cognitive
• imperative
• Leon
• Festinger
• yoryevrah
• Julian
• Jaynes
• Kevin
• McDonald

[thecomposer1962]

Marvin P. Bush, the president's younger brother, was a principal in a company called Securacom that provided security for the World Trade Center, United Airlines, and Dulles International Airport. The company was backed by KuwAm, a Kuwaiti-American investment firm on whose board Marvin Bush also served. According to its present CEO, Barry McDaniel, the company had an ongoing contract to handle security at the World Trade Center "up to the day the buildings fell down."

[stutrix]

Yes there is, the re was a power down and reports of lots of noisey unexplained building work going on on several levels for 6 weeks running up to 9/11.

[alexjohnson45]

all these butt hurt people, who banked on 9/11 for making a name/career...and when an actual intellectual denounces their work, especially in the way Chomsky did, they get their feelings hurt. They just can't let this go, so they scatch and smear in attempt to rebuttal against other Intellectual sources, and to save any remnants of reputation they had prior.

[FAKEPAIN]

@thecomposer1962 already this bit of information is enough to break the whole spell the MSM is channeling

[mistermoen]

Watch this douche, then watch Chomsky. This guy needs to take a science course. If you have evidence to support something, but no evidence against it, that doesn't mean you have even a decent scientific hypothesis.

[PanteraFan1987]

YES! THE TIP OFF TO WHAT THEY ARE GOING TO DO NEXT IS WHAT THEY ARE CRITISIZING OTHERS OF!!!

When the Obama Administration started to critisize china of Internet freedoms...I said right thre, HOLY CRAP, they are taking messures, or going to be taking messures to censor the internet!

This guy has a terriffic mind!...Yes, that is a projection!

[maxistsocialist]

Chomsky is a fake-leftist, he is fucking crazy, he is not only a fake-leftist, he said that Vladimir Lenin was a right-winger and Leon Trotsky was a fascist, go figure for your self if Noam Chomsky is a traitor of the US left

[ExquisiteDoom]

Doesn't really matter what you think here, you don't seem to have what it takes to pursue this discussion. For if you did, of all the alternatives out there, you wouldn't support any keynesianism. I don't care that you disagree with the austrian view, even the biggest austrian icons disagree with each other. Where i take offense is when you deny the fact bubbles create scarcity and wealth destruction, loss of incentive, financial insecurity through boom and bust cycles. But yea you deny this.

[SUpersaiyajinjerkbag]

No, Occams razor suggests he is probably _more_ right than those austrian dipfucks who go out of their way to politicize economics (of course they claim otherwise)

[ExquisiteDoom]

Does it mean keynes is right? Hardly. All he did was promote bubbles. Keynes is undoubtedly a great economic in the macroeconomics sense. Unfortunately macroeconomics don't work. So i honestly don't care for Keynes. When you take out the trash and moan about how much trash you have and come to the conclusion that you need more bags rather than being less of a pack rat, you're bound to being shortsighted.

[SUpersaiyajinjerkbag]

Yeah, a bunch of worthless libertarians who even Reagan wouldnt appoint (he stuck to supply-siders), also even Hayek admitted Keynes was a good economists

Oh, and keynes was both more reputed and demonstrated than any of those fucks

[randombutler]

You make the mistake of assuming that some evidence that's contradictory to the "official version" is reliable simply because it varies from government sources. The reports of "6 or 7" of the hijackers still being alive are very suspect in and of themselves as far as I know. Bin Laden's level of involvement (and current state) is still up for debate, but it's important to remember that plenty of the information that's come out since the 9/11 and the ensuing information shitstorm has been false.

[ExquisiteDoom]

Read an austrian economics book, and you'll realize it completely destroys anything you thought you knew about economics. The nyou realize how far in the ditch liberals are leading us to. But of course, you'll just ignore that and not try to undersand, it's too complicated to find out the truth, it's much more convenient to think that you know than actually knowing, right?

[AnarchyDavey]

If you actually believe members of the real Left are "gatekeepers", than you're an idiot. It would defy what we know about how the media operates, as well as what we know in regards to how this society treats and views the real Left. Not to mention, the real Left doesn't get much play in the mainstream, which would make it pretty fucking hard to "gatekeep" much of anything.

Go read a god damn book!

[AnarchyDavey]

It's a cult. It is anti-intellectualism at its best. Strange having so many "theories" that rely on speculation and hearsay versus scholarship, which relies on sound analysis based on evidence.

[mindprism]

-- TRUTHERS ARE SHILLS for ALEX JONES

Hitler said the sky is blue.

[mindprism]

-- why couldn't Bush "find" a single WMD in all Iraq but could covertly plant tons of munitions inManhattan to destroy 3WTC bildings?

Its about establishing precedent. The administration probably could have planted WMDs quite easily -- they don't because they want to enlarge the sphere of what they can get away with. Its a disempowering technique.

Its also what I term as "Squid Ink" - it keeps people in a state of controversy about reality in order to allow the squid to ultimately slip away.

[silentsoliloquy82]

LOL

[medit84truth]

Why is it when there are holes in a conspiracy theory everybody flips a wig, but when the story everyone believes is the "official" story has holes, nobody bats an eye? I don't trust to much in conspiracies, but do see the questions raised within them. A theory is just someones best guess, not the truth. It's not supposed to be 100% proof. Just because another guys story has inconsistencies doesn't make the inconsistencies in my own disappear.

[medit84truth]

I didn't know the term intellectual as describing and individual meant: "To Know everything in the universe".The use of the term to describe individuals who have a grasp on things is kind shaky. There have have always been "intellectuals" of a particular time peroid in which a lot their assertions were proven wrong. Why is it that when someone considers themselves or others they look up to as intellectuals(smart on a certain level), everything thing they think and feel , must be correct?

[Mycos1]

A job like you suggest takes months of work to pull off. If you had anidea how stupid it sounds to educated intellectuals, you'd wish you had died in the event. Your kids are if they ever find out....

[Mycos1]

Then if it's a case of sheer numbers, professionls overwhelmigly disiss 911Truth as misguided hostility by the gullible in responsto a moneymaking effort by conspiracy writers. ASk yourself, why couldn't Bush "find" a single WMD in all Iraq but could covertly plant tons of munitions in Manhattan to destroy 3 WTC bildings? Too honest? Too many onlookers in the Iraqi desert? Didn't want to?....at the cost of the entire PNAC proect? 911Truth is insane if you stop and think objectively.

[Mycos1]

Chomsky has stated there is "no dispute" among intellectuals to a massive failure and subsequent cover up of gross inaction despite evidence of imminent attack. But what /no/ intellectual buys is the dumb assertion that they engineered a covert demolition of the WTC when they couldn't 'engineer' the "discovery" of a single WMD in all of Iraq! You don't really think they were too honest to pull a trick like that do you? That cost them the House, and with it, Pax Americana. "Think" man!

[oldjoe5]

Huh? The question should be are there any supporters of Zionism who think at all.

[fearonism]

uh.....no

[phoebus1966]

@fearonism , thats because the media won't let them . . . see also 911 Mysteries and other sources that show ample time of empty and cut-off WTC prior to 911.

[kingobnoxious]

Are there any Chomsky supporters who think independently of Chomsky?