SR 520 - Option L Design Simulation
Loading...
Loading...
4,898
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- 4:22SR 520 - Option K Design Simulationby wsdot7,392 views
- 4:20SR 520 - Option A Design Simulationby wsdot17,764 views
- 1:43520 Bridge Replacementby mynorthwest1,287 views
- 2:54Planes of the Future: 797 A360by Chengsta92149,950 views
- 1:28Alaskan Way Viaduct Bored Tunnel January 2009by wsdot30,473 views
- 4:15Alaskan Way Viaduct -- Elevated Structure Alter...by AlaskanWayViaduct4,105 views
- 4:16E-Cell Simulation Environment 3D Promoby gyau11,526 views
- 2:00Tsunami Inundation Of Seattle (NOAA Simulation)by djxatlanta35,285 views
- 1:14Parker Rd at U.S. 75 Project - SPUI Single Poin...by casonbang227 views
- 1:06I90 Bridge Sinksby Weathergoat48,515 views
- 1:05SR 520 Floating Bridge - Simulated failure by e...by wsdot252,707 views
- 2:00RE:NEW Urban Studio Sirroco Quays Masterplan ...by renewurban2,427 views
- 0:53Seattle Viaduct Earthquake Simulation w/ sound ...by indietvfest30,914 views
- 5:07Proposed SR 99 Bored Tunnel Underground Simula...by wsdot25,512 views
- 1:58Pushback Simulationby dinther206,075 views
- 5:00Scientists simulate jet colliding with World Tr...by PurdueRCAC10,005,978 views
- 4:29Alaskan Way Viaduct -- Tunnel Alternativeby AlaskanWayViaduct18,418 views
- 1:25RHW Single-Point Urban Interchange (SPUI) Demoby TarkusSC49,569 views
- 0:55Suspension Bridgeby allnightcodingmike67,135 views
- 5:57Tacoma Narrows Bridge Collapse "Gallopin' Gertie"by GonzoNugent4,842,132 views
this is a dumb option, wheres the set up for the light rail when it comes time for it. for traffic to reduce and Seattle to become a more efficient city we have to have it set in place at the time of construction. the preferred option is the only one that has this, why? you want cars off the freeway, provide an alternative.
SDKX1 10 months ago
I like that new bridge. I'd imagine it's much less expensive than the tunnel. This one, please.
FuriousCoder 2 years ago
I think this may be my favorite option out of all. The main selling point for me is the additional SPUI interchange that aren't in the others. That will help ease traffic around the area.
However, maybe I'm looking at this wrong, but one thing (and I think this is something major) that I noticed was that drivers going from WB 520 to SB I-5 will have to do so through a left-hand side on-ramp. Is that true?
HAWC1506 2 years ago
If it is, I'm quite disappointed in the design, because as far as I can see, all three designs carry this problem. It's been known for years that left-hand side exits and on-ramps can disrupt traffic flow, especially for those looking to get on I-5 from 520 and take the next exit on I-5.
I sure hope I'm not looking at it wrong, but if there is going to be a left-hand side on-ramp, I'm not going to be satisfied with any of these proposals...not that my opinion really matters though.
HAWC1506 2 years ago
Personally like this one, the new bridge takes a lot of pressure off Montlake.
kevinmsft 2 years ago
I'd be curious to see how EB 520 traffic proceeds to SB Montlake Blvd. Perhaps the current 24 Ave E arterial would be completely realigned to the new drawbridge/interchange, avoiding Montlake Blvd altogether.
SteveAusSEA 2 years ago
Plausible. Looks like the greatest neighborhood impact but least claustrophobic during Husky game back ups.
PointMutation 2 years ago