SURVIVOR SAMOA: Erik's Jury Speech

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
21,949
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 21, 2009

Erik gives a passionate speech that brings Natalie to tears.

"REALITY IS REALITY!"

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 31 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • They didn't vote for Nathalie. They were voting against Russell.

  • This was the million dollar speech.

see all

All Comments (432)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The jury didn't want to see Russell or Mick win. This was Russell's season.

  • @jamoalex It's funny when people say "they were voting AGAINST and not FOR" as if it's a bad thing, because that is THE most classic strategy to win Survivor and it actually happened a lot more back in the old seasons where there was a final 2. You don't get to the final tribal council and rely on the jury to respect your game, you get to final tribal and rely on the jury hating the other person more. Obv that's not always the case, but I think most of the winners' votes come down to this.

  • LOL DILLUSIONAL ENTITLEMENT WHAT

  • @BrianHeidik Perhaps, but "social" definitely does work.

  • @AllRequired I wouldn't recommend that. Most posters at sucks, like Mario, overrate social. You need to make the final tribal council and get the votes to win.

    A player who can get the votes to win but not make it to the end is just as bad as a player who can get to the end a lot and never get the votes to win. You need both.

    Many people on sucks are delusional and only think about social game.

  • Natalie is a great winner. Anyone who calls her the worst winner is talking out of bias. The only worst winner possible is PARVATI because they changed it from final 3 to final 2 at the last minute. Not fucking fair. Natalie, however, won fair and without producer manipulation.

  • LOL Though Erik is 100% correct and Natalie is MUCH BETTER then Russell and Mick, he is a such a douche with the air quotes and talking like he's on drugs.

  • @officerbarbrady12 This is the thing: humankind is, by its very nature, emotional. Emotions are the game's main source of fuel. Whether or not Russell was responsible for Natalie's progress is not the issue anymore. What matters is that the name on the winning vote was hers; that's the goal in the end.

    Oh, and you spelled "ruffle" and "doesn't" incorrectly.

  • @AllRequired I have watched survivor every season since it started, so I do understand survivor. I know that Natalie won fair and square and that the jury can vote how ever they want. But you have to look at the situation, without Russell Natalie would never have been there! She did nothing in the game, she was just along for the ride, agreeing with what Russell said and did. I just dont like how he duznt win cuz he did the dirty work and Natalie just didnt ruffell any feathers.

  • @officerbarbrady12 "The Fall of Russell Hantz Part 1" and "Offending Many Who Do Not Understand Survivor." Google. Read. Repeat.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more