Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Two Way ANOVA - SPSS (part 3)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,477
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 18, 2011

I perform and interpret a two way ANOVA in SPSS. The example consists of 2 between subjects factors: one with 2 levels and one with 3 levels. So, it's a 2 * 3 between subjects design. I test both main effects and the interaction effect. I then follow-up with some basic post-hoc tests. I point out that the proper way to test the simple main effects for the interaction can only be achieved by adding a term to the syntax, as it can not be done through the menus. Also, this example is based on unbalanced design. That is, the sample sizes are unequal. This has important implications for factorial anovas, as I demonstrate through comparisons between the means reported in the descriptives table versus the means reported in the 'estimated marginal means' table.

The references I mention in the video are:


Keselman, H. J. Games, P. A., & Rogan, J. C. (1979). Protecting the overall rate of Type I errors for pairwise comparisons with an omnibus test statistic. Psychological Bulletin, 6(4), 884-888.

Keppel, G. (1982). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Howell, D. C. & McConaughy, S. H. (1982). Nonorthogonal analysis of variance: Putting the question before the answer. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42, 9-24.

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (0)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more