224 views
Turn down the lights
Turn up the lights
Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window
Intelligent Design Creationism
Robert T. Pennock, the scientist, philosopher and author of "Tower of Babel, The Evidence Against the New Creationism" speaks on the controversial movement to include intelligent design creationis...
More From: UCtelevision
337 ratings
Sign in to rate
23,075 views
© 2009 YouTube, LLC
"Intelligent Design"? Good! Because intelligent Design pretends to be science, it is the easier to be refuted.
Here is some proof for evolution:
As a rule, the fossils of older, simpler organisms are always found in lower rock layers than the fossils of higher developed ones.
Now explain that away with "intelligent design". And forget "super evolution". That has been long refuted.
Actually, what really matters to me is, to show what the bible really is: A book with many rules of dubious morale value and few real answers, who's writers had the incredible arrogance to declare it "God's word".
BTW, the reason there's an explosion of fossils around the Cambrian because that's around when hard tissues (bones/cartilage) evolved, and hard tissues fossilize a LOT more than soft tissues.
You might as well say "It happened by magic"
They belong to the group of people, that is convinced that knowing too much is damaging to the faith and therefore better to be avoided.
In other words: "Don't think too much, it will only make you unhappy. And now do and think as I told you".
Blind faith is an excellent tool to keep people under control. It conditions them into obedience.
And if you really would have dealt with evolution you would know that evolution doesn't deny gods existence - it explains HOW it works, not WHO is or is not responsible for it. Well, but since you've already been lying about the origin on ID, I assume your opinion about evolutionis a lie aswell.
I believe, that god once created a single, very simple type of cell, out of which all other life devoloped.
I have no more proof for it, it just sounds much more convincing to me than:
"God made Adam (a complex organism) out of dust"
The rest of my version of the genesis is in complete harmony with science.