Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Furtwangler: Beethoven Symphony no. 9 "Choral" (Bayreuth 1951) 4/2/3

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
154,864
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 30, 2009

Ludwig van Beethoven: Symphony no. 9 in D minor op. 125
Elizabeth Schwarzkopf (soprano), Elisabeth Hoengen (alto), Hans Hopf (tenor), Otto Edelmann (bass)
Bayreuth Festspielhausorchester, Wilhelm Furtwangler
Live Recording, July 29 1951

This used to be my favorite recording of the Ninth, but the poor orchestral playing and the poor balances are really starting to wear on me. I prefer the Philharmonia recording, and I would suggest that to people who are unfamiliar with either the work of Furtwangler's conception of it.

Category:

Music

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (shellac1925)

  • plz tell me which country's National Anthem is this ?

  • @imranbug81 It's the anthem of the European Union.

  • Very bad remastering, we can't hear the orchestra.

  • @Renardeau44 Most people have complained that you can't hear the chorus. In any case, the balances are way off, and so is frequency spectrum. The former is impossible to fix, but the latter can be fixed, but EMI didn't do a great job at it. I tried to tweak it once, and it didn't work out. I might take another stab at it soon.

Top Comments

  • @livegems For a singer, 54 IS an advanced age. Most singers are past their prime by then. Also, I write English better than most of the people on YouTube, moron.

see all

All Comments (29)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Renardeau44 well, you can hear them pretty well around the 6 minute mark...

    God this is incredible.

  • @Renardeau44 You could take into due consideration the technical limitations of recording in 1951, and the conditions of Berlin at that time. There can be no "remastering" good enough to compensate for defects in the original recording. As far as I can remember, the recording was then "analogic", and "tape recording" was just at its beginning. Until then, recording was made on a hair-thin steel wire. I used to own a Webster wire recorder then...

  • @shellac1925 Funny, two americans (or, at least, people who give the USA as their country in their YT profiles) bickering about prowess at writing English...

  • Per ora l'unica cosa che ci unisce è la Champions League.

  • this is a typical mono recording with one or two microphones on a single track tape-machine. Not unusual for the early 50s.

  • @shellac1925 interesting you think 54 id an "advanced" age, 1925... learn to write english

  • despite technical weaknesses, it is wonderful to hear this again . thank to all those who made this possible!

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more