Are generals disputing Iraq pullout?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,634
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 19, 2009

More at http://therealnews.com/t/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=102

Do disagreements amongst top generals and Obama on Iraq pullout plan represent a more profound debate?

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Fire the general and bring our troops home. The general should not question the Presidents ever.

    Let's all go solar and stop using oil, that should stop a lot of power play.

  • A 16 month exit schedule is several months before mid-term elections, 23 months is just before the mid-term elections. Dems can run on having gotten out while at 23 months its part of the election debate. Patreaus is trying to help the Republicans with the mid-term elections.

see all

All Comments (53)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • its only a "disaster" from the perspective of those who actually believe the propaganda, that we went there with benevolent intentions--to "liberate" iraq."

    either way, the US will not leave until their dominance in the region is secured, with a puppet gov, oil contracts, the population divided and conquered, etc.

    its just sad that the so called "anti-war" and "pro-war" have melded together in acceptance of imperialism.....as the "responsible" thing to do.

  • So you disagree with JFK policy to stop Russia from arming Cuba with Nukes?

    You wanted those Navy blockades to turn back home ?

  • Notice the whores in Israel are not Jewish, they pimp out girls from West aka Christians.

  • Seems more likely about Jews crippling Irans growth by limiting energy output. Iran has no oil refineries, all exported. They have an energy crisis. Notice that Israel and Cheney never suggest they buy our windmills and trade oil for natural gas.

    It's about limiting Iran's future economy and health, the Nuke bomb is overplayed like Saddam's WMD because the world would not support attacking Iran just to limit growth.

  • remember when violence declined 90% when the iraqies threw the british occupation forces out of basra in 2006? the occupation is the only reason for violence.

  • .. ^^ JOIN OUR GREAT SUBSCRIBERS ^^ ●▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬๑۩۩๑▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬●

    "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for the people of conscience to remain silent" Thomas Jefferson 1820

  • is not even about Muslism . Its about being Fair. If i can drive a BMW the next man has the same right to Drive a BMW.

    We have nukes they have the right to have nukes.

  • 911missinglinksDOTcom

    enjoy the FREE DVD

  • Bush had balls. He pissed on Founding Fathers Constitution ! He got away with treason, etc !

  • Israel = XTC world trade.

    Iran is hurting, they need nuclear plants. Kill their nuclear plans means killing their growth, their prosperity, they will implode !

    It's NOT about NUKES !

    It's about Muslims making a go at life !

  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more