Lennox Vs. Dawkins Debate - Has Science Buried God?

Oxford Museum of Natural History hosts this fascinating and controversial debate on the existence of God. Professor John Lennox explains how science points to an intelligent creator and Richard Dawkins offers a counterargument.

When Dawkins was asked if he ever considered God, he said, ""Yeah maybe I have, but if I have, so what? It doesn't make it true. That's what it matters."

To this I'd like to ask him, how does he know if "it" is not true? Haven't see any evidence? How does it matter to the very existence of God? Does God disappear just because someone thinks there's no "evidence?" Someone is appealing to his own ignorance here if you ask me. ;)

vid by : fixed-point.org

Category:

Education

Tags:

• john
• lennox
• richard
• dawkins
• debate
• oxford
• museum
• natural
• history
• God
• Jesus
• Christ
• the
• Bible
• KJB

[AstronomyGuru84]

@ikwhereyoulive00 “According to science animals don’t have emotion.” I’m sure you have thoroughly researched and have reliable sources on this statement. I’m not sure what you mean by less developed? That’s not very specific. I really don’t care what the bible says. I don't deny god because of religion. I have a problem with the people who follow religion. 

[ikwhereyoulive00]

@opterios are you sure you only dislike lennox because you like evolution?? i came here against dawkings,therefore whether dawkings makes a case or not i am siding with lennox.

we are both biased, whether you know it or not.

[ikwhereyoulive00]

@AstronomyGuru84 the fact that it was immoral was the point! it was to signify innocence is killed by sin. besides, according to science animals don't have emotion and they are less developed than us. and i have NEVER heard a christian say it was a wonderful thing.

in the bible there is evidence that animal sacrifice is no longer necessary along with priests no longer being necessary. please PLEASE learn more about the religion, if not to believe in it, at least so you can reasonably deny god.

[TheLostCuber]

@opterios lennox WON

[lewisfaldo]

@Awake4Truth 100% correct my friend i hate richard dawkins he doesn't even know what he is on about

[Awake4Truth]

Richard let me teach you something.Natural selection is only and has only been observable within its own species, and never been observed to turn from one species to another.FACT! The fact that you teach that one species turns into another is all apart of your big imagination and nothing more.

Has anyone noticed that whenever Richard says the word Evolution he always sounds like his saying what it really is 'Evil Illusion'

Every time he says it, it sounds like 'Evil Illusion'

Good coincidence :)

[balouthewatz]

Richard is great !