Wrong Hindu Idols--Yudhishtra is AdharmaRaj

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,675
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 9, 2009

Indian Society is worshipping wrong idols for centuries.One of them is Yudhishtra.Eldest of Pandavas.He is considered a DharmRaj i.e.the moralist one,the sacred one,one who always abide by the rules and regulation of society.But according to me his conducts are lower than an ordinary being.He is AdharmRaj i.e. one who immoral one,who is the king of immorals.You go through the video and decide yourself.

One viewer--"indialandofpeace"--commented------------------"I did not get how was the fight between adharma and adharma... The kauravs were always on the wrong side of dharma.... Pandavs were always following the right path... just a single mistake of betting himself or anyone else doesnt make him a wrong man... he paid for his wrong doings by going for a vanvas... even in the mahabharat it was said that what yudhistra did was wrong... i guess you should have put more thought into what you have said in your video..
Cheers"

This was a highest ranked comment on this video of mine.Here is my answer to his/her comment.Please do read it.


" In those days only Eldest son of a king used be the next king, Pandu though not the eldest son yet was made king temporarily because Dhritrashtra was blind.
But he left the kingdom and went to the jungles and there he dies Dhritrashtra again sits on the throne.
Now sons of Dhrit and Pandu both become young, the question was ---who should be made the next king?
It was the Suyodhana, who was the real successor being the eldest son of the present king and the original king----Dhritrashtra .( Pandu was just a temporary king for some time, who himself left the kingdom willingly.)
Yet Pandavas were given Khandavaprastha and Yudhishtra became king of Khandavaprastha------And U see no Adharma from Pandav side.

They invited Suyodhan and, Draupadi insulted him------------And U see no Adharma from Pandav side.

Yudhishtra lost Draupadi, his brothers, his kingdom, himself in gambling---------------And U see no Adharma from Pandava side.

After losing all and everything, they started claiming that Shakuni cheated in the game of dice—if this was the case,why they did not stop playing dice when they smelled cheating.After losing every loser says that the winner has cheated---------And U see no Adharma from Pandava side.

After losing something in a game a loser does not have any right on that (Yudhishtra treated Draupadi also as a thing by putting her on a stake in the game of dice), yet they were getting angry on Kauravs because of their (Kauravs) so called misbehavior with Draupadi. They had no right to be angry with Kauravs on this issue as they had already lost Draupadi . Now she belonged to Kauravs not Pandavs---------And U see no Adharma from Pandavs side.

Similarly after losing their kingdom in gambling, they had no right to regain the kingdom, yet Krishna was trying to regain the lost kingdom for them---------------------And U see no Adharma in it.

They were given a chance of getting the lost kingdom after Vanvaas of 12 years and Ekaantavaas of 1 year --why they should be given a chance to regain that kingdom once they lost it--yet they were given a chance----------------------------And U see no Adharma in it.

Kurukshetra Yudha was to be fought under Dharama--called Dharmayudha,yet
Bhisma,Drona,Karna and even Suyodhan, all were killed breaking rules by Pandavas ----And U see no Adharma in it.

See carefully and U will easily find that Mahabharat was a fight between Adharma and Adharma--Not Dharma and Adharma--And Krishna and Pandava were more on the side of Adharma than Kaurvas."

  • likes, 17 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (tusharcosmic)

  • Hey.. your points are not hard hitting. Very silly. Especially the one with respect to indira gandhi. I think you should put out a particular point after considering all aspects and scenrios. I think you read books but your ability to read it with an open mind is questionable. If you criticise individual character of a book called mahabharatha.. you should first understand the entire story for which it was intended.. and then analyse individual charachters..!! i hope u will do better in future.

  • @anoopsukumar , But you have no where clarified rationale behind any of your objections, please do that so that I may reply your objections one by one.

Top Comments

  • to mr tushar aap hi batayeen ki kaun sa dharam aapnayen hum log?? was muhammad ok?

    was christ ok??

  • I did not get how was the fight between adharma and adharma... The kauravs were always on the wrong side of dharma.... Pandavs were always following the right path... just a single mistake of betting himself or anyone else doesnt make him a wrong man... he paid for his wrong doings by going for a vanvas... even in the mahabharat it was said that what yudhistra did was wrong... i guess you should have put more thought into what you have said in your video..

    Cheers

    Jai Hind

see all

All Comments (78)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • you are right what yudhistra did is wrong but this is the whole point. lord krishna didnt come because it shows clearly how bad gambling can get. a person can loose there senses and mind no matter how much you follow dharama. if you look at it dhuryodhans father is the main bad guy. you should also look at the concept of karma. if karna or bhisma etc.... we all good people without bad deeds. they were trapped having to fight on the side of adharam. at this point there karma turns against them.

  • Hindus are full of shit

  • hey poor boy read full mahabharata or watch episodes which are available in youtube.u will come to know the truth how grate yudhistir was.

    jai ho jesus christ.

  • @rajkamalsangwan

    Koi dharam apnane ki need nai.......? GOD is GOD.....dere is no need of religions to believe in god .

  • @rajkamalsangwan ... brother MUHAMMAD(peace be upon him) is 100% perfect. don't judge MOHAMMAD(p.b.u.h) by looking at any other muslim... the best way to know about MOHAMMAD(p.b.u.h).. is to read QURAN and HADEES... if you cant read then watch DR ZAKIR NAIK vedios in youtube...

  • plz comment on all religions not one else u will be treated as hatred person not secular.

  • you did not understand, actually when Pm is fixed I mean in a major winning political party has fixed the process of PM making then If i will be son of rahul Gandhi in next jama then I will know this that I can be PM of this nation if my ancestors party (congress) will win the election, then when I will become PM I will not think about people of India. I will just enjoy the life and just make efforts which would be enough to keep my party in Govt.

    No progress very little fear to loose anything

  • aap ko mahabharth puri dekhni chahye

    yudhishtra agar panchali aur apne bhaiyo ko dao pe na lagata to ye kese sidh hota ki juwa buri cheez hai jura budhi brisht kardeta hai chahe vo dharamraj yudhishtra ho ya koi aur

  • Your face is the fowlest piece of shit i have ever seen,but u already know that,don't you...

    An advice(although u will not follow it)-look at the good things taught by all the religious books.You are trying to analyze a great personality like Yudhisthira based on a few incidents.You are not upto the job because you don't know even the full story.SO KEEP UR FAT MOUTH SHUT

  • dear thakur ese hote hai ....appni ann aur ban k liye vo appko bhi nhi dekhenge

  • @tusharcosmic

    all I am saying is that if you want to be taken seriously then make some criticism of other religions like Islam.

    you claim that you do not have knowledge about Islam , well then you are just a hate monger to me.

    read Hitchens and Dawkins and leaern the true meaning of atheism.

    you have not yet replied me that ok i am going to make a video against Islam and Christianity.

    so your criticism reeks of racism.

  • @canadatubeonly Now I have also made it clear to you who is hater of Hinduism--people like you who do not want to see that what is wrong in hinduism and who do not bother to rectify the mistakes of the forefathers of Hindus,who do not want that this section of humanity called Hindus may come out of their foolosh idealogies.

    and one more thing Hate and Criticism are two different things.

  • @canadatubeonly But you are hell bent on one thing why do not I speak against christians/Islam etc.Listen again,if you can every so called religion is just bundle of superstitions,understand.

    If I would have been able to known the mythology,theology of anty other religion,I would have spoken in the same manner.

    Also tell me the name of the software who confirmed my knowledge of Islam/Christianity is as good as that of Hinduism.

  • @canadatubeonly Mind your language,second mistake and you will be blocked.

    Athiest are not who don't believe in any religion.Budha/Mahaveera were athiests but very much Dharmik.

    And how did you decide that I speak against Hinduism only,if you have visited any my other videos ,I have spoken on diverse issues of life challenging common beliefs which may be related to any person believeing in any religion of this world.

  • @tusharcosmic

    you claim that you do not believe in any religion , the most famous atheist on youtube are dawkins and hitchens

    you know why because though they are Christians ,they speak against all religion , not any one particular religion .

    and as long as you continue to speak against hinduism only you will be only considered as a barking moron who hate Hindus , that is it.

    and you are lying that you do not know much about other religion,

    it is just you hate Hindus only

    you are simpl hater

  • @canadatubeonly Spirituality has nothing to do with accepting some pre-recoded /accepted methods.It is just experimenting with oneself--one--SELF.

    And I do not hate any one except idiocy of the humanity.At their time Raja Ram,Socrates,Jesus all were seen as enemy of the present society.I am not great at all like them but just citing examples to make the things clearer.

    now do not answer if you do not want to talk,it is your will.

  • @canadatubeonly you are just nuts .Even after such clear answers ,unable to understand anything.Or you want to understand things in your own way.None can make you understood that a dog has four legs if you are hellbent on understanding that it has five legs.Can't you read ,I have said that all the so called religions of this world are just different sets of superstitions,they are just keeping the humanity retarded/subhuman/idiotic.Hind­uism or any other ism- no difference at all.

  • @tusharcosmic

    as I wrote that I will take your opinion seriously only when you make a video against Islam , till then you are just a Hindu hater racist to me.

    so do not just talk the talk .......

  • @canadatubeonly, Meanwhile do understand that all the so called religions are nothing but different sets of superstitions only.People jump from one deep dark well to another and this they call conversion.

  • @canadatubeonly ,I may not come in general definition of atheist or theist.Raja Ram Mohan Roy opposed Sati,you know what the priests said --that he is anti Hinduism.

    \Listen ,I am born and brought up in a Hindu -Sikh family so I know more about them, hence I can point out their shortcomings easily.Believe me if knew shortcomings of Islam,I would have spoken in a similar way.

  • @tusharcosmic

    so you are an atheist , well i will believe only when i see a video against Islam by you till then you are nothing but one of those anti hindu morons

  • @canadatubeonly wow U comment without describing how you concluded what you concluded abt me.U are a Hindu and U were a catholic.From one deep dark well to another one.All so called religions are nothing but different sets of superstitions.

    Better find out the minus points in my videos and point out here and just wait I would be answernig you within hours.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more