Why "Same Designer, Same Genes" is not a valid argument.

http://s262.photobucket.com/albums/ii119/DonExodus/?action=view&current=P...

"Same Gene, Same Designer". Weve all heard it, this refutes it. Its refutation is the basis for 16s ribosomal typing, paternity testing, DNA testing, etc.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• same
• common
• designer
• genes
• argument
• refuted
• debunked
• theory
• of
• evolution
• creationism
• intelligent
• design
• 16s
• typing

[florisv559]

(Contnd) So an OOP designer would still come up with something that looks much like common descent, except that all species could still have been created on the same day. The case against design should be about how the solutions found in nature always fall a bit short of real perfection. And about examples of plain bad design. Why would a designer who works with reusable code make so many different designs for the eye - and some of them inferior at that?

[florisv559]

I'm probably being stupid, but this video doesn't make sense. You could make a good case for a designer trained in OOP, who would start with the AAAAA string for that enzyme in reptilians and then would modify that according to need for the different groups descending from the reptilians. Any intelligent designer faced with the task to create zillions different species would say "to hell with efficiency" and work with reusable code. DNA would still have to mean something, even in a design.

[MessengerOfTruth27]

@@thybigballs I'm saying these things to say this. So called Genetic DNA designations don't make sense. Like so called Geneticists supposedly tracing these so called jews ancestry back to the middle east. Common sense would tell ppl that it takes money to run these labs. & who run these banks? so called Jews. Who run the media? The people actually fund these corporate stations, that's a no brainer. They tell people what they want them to hear. They say the wrong thing & their out of bussiness

[MessengerOfTruth27]

@thybigballs Why is it so interesting? DNA of a son or daughter only resembles their parents DNA. If you don't accurate understand who a jew(Israelite) is you can't possibly accurately say who is or is not an Israelite. Hence, people come up with bogus theories to "try" to connect events that obviously don't fit. If your in Jerusalem & the romans are coming from the North why would you flee in2 neighboring countries of Rome? Like European countries where Rome could easily find you makes no sense

[thybigballs]

@TruthIsLife7 "Most have been disproven, discarded, and abandoned even by those who do put blind faith in universal common descent...and the current version is in big trouble and likely will be discarded in a few years for some new hypothesis...anything except what science supports most, creation."===How is the theory of evolution in big trouble? Out of the 300,000 plus biologists (just in the U.S. alone) has any of them shown there's big problems with evolution?

[thybigballs]

@MessengerOfTruth27 "You can't prove a person is a jew by dna testing". I find this quote very fascinating.

[MessengerOfTruth27]

Your DNA information in general is bogus. Foolishness, it makes no sense at all. You cannot prove a person is an indian or a jew, by dna testing. Do the research on it.

[Marazish]

@TheGamanic

You do realize that the bible says that It is the absolute truth, gods word is law.

So, If one piece is proven false, the whole thing crumbles under it's own weight.

Nobody is threatened by it what so ever ASIDE for people of other religions, the same way you are threatened by paganism or Wicca .

[omgwtfbbqxD]

@TruthIsLife "Darwinism" has been observed. I guess you could call that "proof", something creationists lack. If you understood how evolution worked, you would realize how irrifutable it is. There really is no room for interpretation, it is a scientific fact. As for the origin of life itself, we don't really know yet. There are theories however, which are being tested. You see, rather then creationists, who just say "God did it, it says so in the bible.", scientists actually test their theories.

[TruthIsLife7]

@nejtilsvampe Btw, I commend you for being willing to correct yourself. That shows you have integrity&possibly a more open mind than others.There are many forms of Darwinism&even more of universal common descent. Most have been disproven, discarded, and abandoned even by those who do put blind faith in universal common descent...and the current version is in big trouble and likely will be discarded in a few years for some new hypothesis...anything except what science supports most, creation.