Atheism

Atheism: The belief that there was nothing and nothing happened to nothing and then nothing magically exploded for no reason, creating everything and then a bunch of everything magically rearranged itself into self-replicating bits which then turned into dinosaurs . . . . Makes perfect sense.

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• Atheism
• belief
• irony
• faith

[kysmelmonge]

Hopefully this is satire. But this is what happens when primitive man is put near more intelligent civilized people

[KringleOfBorg]

@kysmelmonge - yeah, I know exactly what you mean - /watch?v=_voTiCTqv4Q

[KringleOfBorg]

Were Nicolaus Copernicus who is considered the Father of Modern Astronomy, Modern Physics, and Science, and Isaac Newton who all had a belief in God either as the Christian God or as a Deity - would they be considered retards for their belief in God? What about a philosopher scientists such as Gottfied Liebniz who is credited with the discovery of infinitesimal calculus? What about Einstein? What about Georges Henri Joseph Éduard Lemaître the scientist priest who first suggested the Big Bang?

[KringleOfBorg]

@ ensittare - you might check out my new playlist on the Shroud of Turin which is presented from the viewpoint of science & history - even the famous Atheist Richard Dawkins admits there is controversy with the carbon dating, the one scientific stumbling block to public acceptance. - /tnz3Z - using goo and then a dot gl to access the short cut

[ensittare]

Are you american, or just a retard?

[KringleOfBorg]

@ensittare /vi9pT again using goo and then a dot gl to access the short cut - if you have at least a minor in philosophy or are at least versed in David Hume or Immanuel Kant's philosophys, you might be adequate to respond to my blog and see why I say, from the point of science, "Why Science can neither prove or disprove God's existence" - it is not even adequate to the challenge because of its own limitations, something the Englishmen David Hume would agree with.

[KringleOfBorg]

(*)

The actual statement was originally in a radio lecture in 1982. It may have been a wild guess, but "A colleague of mine worked out that a yeast cell and a 777 airplane have the same number of parts, the same level of complexity" (3). (The Boeing 747-400 has 6 million parts). Hoyle uses the Boeing-747 argument to prove the impossibility of the natural origin of life. - home.planet.nl/~gkorthof/korth­o46a.htm

[KringleOfBorg]

A junkyard contains all the bits and pieces of a Boeing-747, dismembered and in disarray. A whirlwind happens to blow through the yard. What is the chance that after its passage a fully assembled 747, ready to fly, will be found standing there? (*).

[KringleOfBorg]

@Kwinnky: Perhaps if people like Dawkins studied the Philosophy from which Science sprang forth, and good Religious thought from the beginning was married to Philosophy (a love of Wisdom translated from the ancient Greek), they might be able to talk about metaphysics. Does life have a purpose or is it an accident and meaningless? Wondered if Dawkins ever read the Hebrew in Genesis to realize TOV (good) means not only God saw it was good, but with potential to be even better, hence evolution.

[KringleOfBorg]

@ Kwinnky: Many scientist honestly don't deal with metaphysics, but then there are those that dare to believe they do. Such men never stopped to read the works of Descartes, Spinoza, or Leibniz, nor Locke, Berkeley, or Hume, nor the debate between European Rationalists & British Empiricists, which David Hume brought to an end when logically he took the scientific method to its logical ends and wound up with total skepticism. Science sprang from Philosophy, which sprang from Religion.