But WTC 7 Wasn't Hit By A Plane!

Some people think that WTC 7 had to be a controlled demolition because no plane hit the building. That is true, but debris from the collapsing North Tower did, and caused a lot of damage.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• wtc7
• 911
• conspiracy
• theories

[aditas217]

In other words what you're saying is that the structure was compromised and it was leaning badly right? Then explain how it fell straight down on its own footprint?

[boloboffin]

@aditas217 It didn't fall straight down on its footprint. Severe damage to building to north. It fell to south as it fell. The debris from 1 caused the fires that weren't resisted on lower floors and that's what caused the building to fall. The structural damage contributed to how the building fell, but not directly why the building fell.

[aditas217]

@boloboffin Sorry, but it did fall down symmetrically on its own footprint.

[boloboffin]

@aditas217 Sorry, but it didn't. There was nothing symmetrical in the way the building fell. It didn't fall into its own footprint, unless you consider hitting a building across a four-lane road part of 7's footprint. You need to figure out what happened to the building without listening to the lies of the Professional 9/11 Truth movement.

[ManFromMelbourne]

Who did this video? Bits of debris hitting the top of the building 7 aint gonna bring the whole building down in an even free fall speed. Not to mention turning much of the steel building into dust. It was a demolition, admit it.

[boloboffin]

@ManFromMelbourne The building's full collapse was not a "even free fall speed." The steel was not turned to dust.

[KnowledgeIsPowr]

"free-fall speed. Which only happens when there is no resistance."

-Actually true free fall speed only happens in a vacuum.

[judeGti]

If it was progressive then it would require time for the load to shear stress bearing points one level at a time. Thus it would not fall at free-fall speed. Which only happens when there is no resistance.

[StrengthFromAbove83]

@aditas217 EVEN THE TWIN TOWERS DIDN'T FALL IN THEIR OWN FOOTPRINT! YOU CAN WATCH THEM TIP OVER...

[TheEots]

WTC 7’s Column 79—the structural component identified as the one whose failure on 9/11 started the progressive collapse—would still have led to a complete loss of the building if fire or damage from the falling debris of the nearby WTC 1 tower were not factors. The investigation team concluded that the column’s failure under any circumstance would have initiated the destructive sequence of events.....NIST. GOV

[arkor7]

good video

[FievelJ69]

To date,, this is still one of the best explanations of what truly happened on that day back in 2001.

But it's nowhere near enough for conspiracy theorists to shut up..

I really wish they would though.

The only thing they keep doing,, is pointing me to other videos,, which don't expose it quite like this one..

Fieve.. ;-) :-)