9/11 Commission Report bars 503 1st responder eyewitnesses

can anyone point me to the original report of 911?

I think the 9/11 Commission is considered the official report. You can buy it from most internet bookstores.

The other official reports are FEMA (first) and NIST (10.000 pages, last). There are other "investigations" as well, like the Silverstein/Weidlinger report and one more... I don't remember the name of it, but it was conducted by gov't contractors I believe... civil engineers something something. Google it.

Who did it and how they did it is never been proven to me and it's definitly strange to exclude other posibilities.

abdula: The WTC floors did NOT support any of the bldgs structure. The Tower's extensive core and perimeter columns constituted their load-bearing capacity -- floor collapse in and of itself would not cause the entire superstructure to lose almost its entire load-carrying ability so that the upper structure would accelerate to near free-fall speed. Eyewitness reports of massive explosions together with evidence of sol-gel nano-thermite residue should have been examined if only to rule them out.

yes i know that, that is not exactly what i'm saying. Ofcourse it's the columns, that's why i said steel stucture. But it happened on one height or floor i would think. Maybe 3 floors, but that's not that importent for the explanation. However what i do not know is if this is actually possible just by force in this matter, and that is interesting. I would expect just wrecked and crumpled steel, anyway not molten for weeks.

You know jack shit. Over 800 architects and engineers believe it was a controlled demolition. But you don't exclude explosives. Hmm you can't have it both ways.

Sadly the 911 Commission did NOT do America JUSTICE!

imtheusertoo: Wha???? The 'facts' that were ignored by the 911 commission were on-site witness statements of explosions. Your facetious idiocy in mixing in nonsense shows you are a blowhard moron: QED. Whether the facts of witnessed explosions have a reasonable explanation as due to something other than CD was never examined. Why? THAT'S the important question, along with why the FBI, CIA & other gov. agencies systematically covered-up & obscured info contradicting the official explanation.

Because of the huge mass it's not strange at all that they came down ALMOST vertically. But i think it's strange that the hijackers would hit the buildings both at that same particular height were the buildings would come down straight. Critical in 911 i think is who exactly ordered the hijackers if it were hijackers.