9/11 Commission Report bars 503 1st responder eyewitnesses

Within a month of 9/11, NYC fire commissioner Thomas Von Essen, a 30-year NYFD veteran, set up interviews with fire, port authority police and EMT first responders to record their initial impressions of what they experienced on Sept 11.
The stories of 503 men and women ran to 12,000 pages. Graeme MacQueen, a recently retired religious studies professor, read them all. In addition to the heartrending nature of many of the stories, the consistent theme was of hearing, feeling and seeing explosions, a controlled demolition. Failure to officially acknowledge this evidence is further proof of an inside job. MacQueen (McMaster University, Ontario, Canada) narrowed down the testimony of 118 first responders as especially court-worthy testimony. But he notes the entire testimony was excluded by the 9/11 Commission, as well as the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). [Part 1 of 2; Part 2: First Responders Testimony] Video prepared for the Vancouver 9/11 Truth Conference, June 22-24, 2007 / snowshoefilms yoryevrah

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Graeme
• MacQueen
• 9/11
• Thomas
• Von
• Essen
• firemen
• port
• authority
• EMT
• explosions
• controlled
• demolition
• bombs
• inside
• job
• NYFD
• yoryevrah
• snowshoefilms

[countessarcadius]

THE BIGGEST ATROCITY OF THEM ALL, IS THEM NOT ALLOWING THE FIRST RESPONDERS TO THE 9/11 MEMORIAL EITHER? HOW COULD THEY , OR ANYONE LET THAT HAPPEN>?THESE ARE THE PEOPLE THAT RUN IN, when everyone else RUNS OUT! AND THEY SCREW THEM OUT OF BEING RECOGNIZED AS THE HERO;S OF THIS INCIDENT? ABSOLUTELY ASHAMED OF THE AMERICANS FOR ALLOWING THAT TO HAPPEN, HOW SHAMEFUL,

[countessarcadius]

DOES EVERYONE KNOW THAT GEORGE BUSH AND TONY BLAIR HAVE BEEN FOUND GUILTY FOR WAR CRIMES BY the The Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal which held a four day hearing in the Malaysia.? WELL THEY DID, FUNNY HOW OUR CENSORED PROPAGANDA MEDIA HAS NEVER LET A PEEP OUT ABOUT THAT? WATCH THIS VID AND GET IT OUT TO AS MANY AS YOU CAN, HE;S RIGHT UP THER WITH HITLER PEOPLE, then we wonder about Bill 1867? /watch?v=pZxa0-IXl_U

[countessarcadius]

to me one of the MOST baffling, is because of 9/11 THAT INCIDENT, Bush went into IRAQ , AND KILLED SUDDAM HUSSEIN, ONLY TO 11 YRS LATER, SAY IT WAS OSAMA BIN LADEN, how could all the masses not even put together the fact that the US military, went in, AND OCCUPIED 2 COUNTRIES BECAUSE OF 9/11. THEY KILLED SUDDAM HUSSEIN FOR WHO? FOR WHAT? they get caught guarding the opium fields and the excuse they give is WELL, THEY WILL TURN TO THE TALIBAN? WTF? THERE TO GUARD OPIUM?

[califranky]

Can someone tell me what exactly is the meaning of Facts and Theories, my English no good,,, in the dictionary it breaks it down to this; some real shit happened that day, who was the real shot caller? funny how the truth sounds like a bell and what we was told up to now never rang, so if u got one that could get something banging in there court room than my bell gonna go bing, me gonna be sooooooooo happy, just for the record, I´m with everything they say in this vid, and me say: DIAAAAAMN

[AlwaysSomething]

@MrDasher01 We only assume a plane/fire took down the building because we watched this happen. This is why there are alternative theories, the official theories don't take into account that this was not supposed to happen, it was designed to take this hit.Cruise speed of a 767 is 530mph, of a 707 is 607mph.The reality is controlled demo explains the collapses a hell of a lot easier, where as NIST took 7 years to come up with a final theory, which contradicts the last and is still an assumption.

[AlwaysSomething]

@MrDasher01 Frank A. Demartini, on-site construction manager for the World Trade Center: The building was designed to have a fully loaded 707 crash into it. That was the largest plane at the time. I believe that the building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners because this structure is like the mosquito netting on your screen door -- this intense grid -- and the jet plane is just a pencil puncturing that screen netting. It really does nothing to the screen netting.

[AlwaysSomething]

@MrDasher01 Our analysis indicated the biggest problem would be the fact that all the fuel (from the airplane) would dump into the building. There would be a horrendous fire. A lot of people would be killed, ... The building structure would still be there.

[AlwaysSomething]

@MrDasher01 John Skilling was the head structural engineer for the World Trade Center. In a 1993 interview, Skilling stated that the Towers were designed to withstand the impact and fires resulting from the collision of a large jetliner such as Boeing 707 or Douglas DC-8.

[AlwaysSomething]

@MrDasher01 John Skilling :The buildings have been investigated and found to be safe in an assumed collision with a large jet airliner (Boeing 707—DC 8) traveling at 600 miles per hour. Analysis indicates that such collision would result in only local damage which could not cause collapse or substantial damage to the building and would not endanger the lives and safety of occupants not in the immediate area of impact. City in the Sky, Times Books ..., , page 134-136

[MrDasher01]

Your "hypothesis" would have to be confirmed as true with controls and variables i.e. action, not conjecture. And it intrigues me that your "hypothesis" does not take into account that jets full of fuel flying at 600 mph, colliding into and destroying the structural sheath of the building where the majority of its strength lay have nothing to do with the collapse.