Lec 24 | MIT 3.091 Introduction to Solid State Chemistry
Loading...
Loading...
19,214
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
34 videos
MIT 3.091 Introduction to Solid State Chemistry, Fall 2004- 40:28Sonorous Currents | MIT 21M.380 Music and Techn...by MIT1,281 views
- 7:44An Overview of Key Ideas | MIT 18.06SC Linear A...by MIT273 views
- 18:41Differential Equations and exp (At) | MIT 18.06...by MIT250 views
- 8:04Least Squares Approximation | MIT 18.06SC Linea...by MIT14 views
- 50:07Lec 9 | MIT 5.60 Thermodynamics & Kinetics, Spr...by MIT17,418 views
- 48:22Lec 3 | MIT 5.111 Principles of Chemical Scienc...by MIT48,100 views
- 9:13Fick's First Law of Diffusionby EngineerClearly779 views
- 50:22Lec 30 | MIT 3.091 Introduction to Solid State ...by MIT32,901 views
- 50:50Lec 23 | MIT 3.091 Introduction to Solid State ...by MIT25,234 views
- 50:43Lec 25 | MIT 3.091 Introduction to Solid State ...by MIT26,119 views
- 50:12Lec 25 | MIT 8.02 Electricity and Magnetism, Sp...by MIT36,903 views
- 5:17Fick's First Lawby BigTunaAcademy1,495 views
- 3:52Drawing curves from their derivativesby JoelCayford5,888 views
- 9:37Fick's Lawby interconnectome3,414 views
- 4:46mechanical properties of materials(part 1)by arnab6393,117 views
- 48:28Lec 25 | MIT 5.111 Principles of Chemical Scien...by MIT6,286 views
- 51:55Lec 20 | MIT 8.02 Electricity and Magnetism, Sp...by MIT69,543 views
- 4:33Episode 1: Diffusionby KevinWallenstein6,335 views
- 57:48Lec 1 | MIT 24.209 Philosophy In Film and Other...by MIT25,144 views
@Liebetraurig You're right. As far as I can tell he made a mistake. It should be x=√(Dt).
joeydifranco0422 6 months ago
Congratulations to pr. Sadoway, and thanks for such a significant input.
lhyd7hak 9 months ago
at 35:36 he crossed the 2 on both sides of equation, then why we still have x=2sqrt(DT) shouldn't it be x=sqrt(DT)????????????
Liebetraurig 1 year ago
35:55 TOO EPIC
zapo147 1 year ago
Vocabulary is invaluable in dealing in a class with this level of complexity. Holy shit.
OniLunchbox 1 year ago
he frickin screwed erf(x)...!!!...didn't anyone notice..???...its not zero at x=0...though he's correct about linear part...vesides he isn't explaining to a decent level..what he is teaching..
vaibhav1803 1 year ago
yea but with a degree in chem you can stackin mad paper and the jobs are endless
jayseo 2 years ago
I could never imagine studying this, its nuts. This is why im going into art:]
jus7aphas3 2 years ago
lol i have to make a calcium atom poster, the whole thing...and who made it and other shit...i hate school
TheDragonageorigins 2 years ago
pretty cool
what was the web site?
shkoder123 2 years ago