Train v plane: who will win your business
Uploader Comments (BetterTransport)
Top Comments
-
This film seems to suggest that the rail industry enjoys no government subsidy - my understanding is that it receives about £5bn a year.
All Comments (19)
-
In America
Plane: Hehehehehe I am so fast
Train: You cannot win!
Plane: OH SH*T
Train: HAHAHAH
Plane: -_- *Is slammed into and patted down by TSA*
-
Henceforth, any travel I do in the lower 48 states, and Canada, will all be by train. Only overseas will be by plane. With that being said, my money will be going to train travel.
-
I agree trains are way better, in the U.S. Amtrak must travel over freight railroads tracks. It causes heavey delays and its a lot slower than airplanes. But the dignity of traveling by train is still better than being pact into a small plane like sardines. Where rail-passenger service beats airlines is intercity commuting, and urban corridors, such as Richmond. to Boston, Ann Arbor-Chicago or San Diego-L.A.
-
trains rock planes are a mock
Thanks for the uplifting video during such grim times
publictransport4us 2 years ago
You're welcome. With your help, we can send the Government a strong message that we want lower train fares.
BetterTransport 2 years ago
No mention of Air Passenger Duty.
No mention of public rail subsidy.
No mention of UK tax payer underwriting operating losses of the private train operating companies.
XPLAlN 2 years ago 2
Even with air passenger duty and the public investment in rail, the airlines are heavily favoured. The Treasury has said that airlines benefit to the tune of £10 billion a year by not having to pay fuel tax and vat. The Treasury expects air passenger duty in 2009/10 to reach just £1.8 billion.
BetterTransport 2 years ago
Great video - and nice that you got link love from The Guardian.
byrongsmith 2 years ago 3
Glad you liked it, Byron! Do spread the word.
BetterTransport 2 years ago