Duh. Look at all the comments on here. Does no one watch the news? Dick Chainey admitted recently that they shot down flight 93. Duh. They lied about it and covered that up for 10 years.
@gradfark The fuel is in the wings. They are both the largest in area, the heaviest and the LEAST aerodynamic once they deform. Ok. do a simple test. Take something with the same density, shape and speed and drop it (fly it) into water. You'll see plenty of material on the surface after the impact due to explosion and NOT refloating. This whole thing is silly. The Pentagon? What a joke. NO big pieces anywhere? It's physically not possible when taking about aluminum...
It is not possible to make a successful connection from a "regular" cell phone when airborne. A "fight phone," which is imbedded into the aircraft electrical/avionics systems, yes.
It has been previously reported, supposedly, that some of the cell phone records were reviewed and no record was found that confirmed such calls were made during that period.
@umaxen01 Yeah, throw a model airplane at dirt......just like a high velocity nose dive into the ground with a fuel-laden airliner. Now, why is it no one takes 911-Truthers seriously again?
At any point of impact, you have an "explosion" or separation of material. Have you ever seen a radio controlled plane crash? It comes apart. Granted the small plane is ultra light weight, and has far less structural density compared to a full sized jet, but there still should be large pieces of aluminum, tires, seats, insulation and so on. Take a box. fill it with various items of different density and throw it against a pile of dirt or sand. Will it all get buried? No...
Duh. Look at all the comments on here. Does no one watch the news? Dick Chainey admitted recently that they shot down flight 93. Duh. They lied about it and covered that up for 10 years.
Duh. WHY DO YOU TRUST THE GOVERNMENT???
DUH.
themanningsjdsjjj 23 hours ago
@gradfark The fuel is in the wings. They are both the largest in area, the heaviest and the LEAST aerodynamic once they deform. Ok. do a simple test. Take something with the same density, shape and speed and drop it (fly it) into water. You'll see plenty of material on the surface after the impact due to explosion and NOT refloating. This whole thing is silly. The Pentagon? What a joke. NO big pieces anywhere? It's physically not possible when taking about aluminum...
umaxen01 1 day ago
@capri231 Yep
He stabbed himself in the back four times and threw himself off a bridge.
MBachirov 1 day ago
Im guessing this guy "commited suicide" ?
capri231 1 day ago
@VulturesPicnic Judy Wood? Is she the scientist that supported the theory that the WTC was hit by Lazer Beams?
Spindry96 1 day ago
It is not possible to make a successful connection from a "regular" cell phone when airborne. A "fight phone," which is imbedded into the aircraft electrical/avionics systems, yes.
It has been previously reported, supposedly, that some of the cell phone records were reviewed and no record was found that confirmed such calls were made during that period.
trsandyb 2 days ago
@umaxen01 Yeah, throw a model airplane at dirt......just like a high velocity nose dive into the ground with a fuel-laden airliner. Now, why is it no one takes 911-Truthers seriously again?
gradfark 2 days ago
@SuperJR4444 it seems youtube doesn't want me to give this comment a thumbs up... i wonder why?
Metalpaved 2 days ago
At any point of impact, you have an "explosion" or separation of material. Have you ever seen a radio controlled plane crash? It comes apart. Granted the small plane is ultra light weight, and has far less structural density compared to a full sized jet, but there still should be large pieces of aluminum, tires, seats, insulation and so on. Take a box. fill it with various items of different density and throw it against a pile of dirt or sand. Will it all get buried? No...
umaxen01 3 days ago
@umaxen01 Well, how would it get "separated into components" in the air?
gradfark 3 days ago