M5 vs 335i
Top Comments
All Comments (362)
-
@deepenough666 man.. i went to school for this stuff and passed . im extremely confident with what im saying lol. otherwise you would probobly be seeing lambos being runned down by 2.0 turbos and evos/sti lol
-
@dolebanana12 Have you seen 1/4 mile runs of cars with n/a power at altitude vs cars with FI power at altitude? Both FI and N/a experience power loss at altitude - but N/A cars are even more adversely affected. There is no way for a N/A car to compensate for loss of air density at altitude - MAF/air density sensor, it doesn't matter. It will still be sucking in air below 1 bar and that is what will eventually be combusted, the MAF/air density sensor only compensate for this.
-
@deepenough666 mass air flow sensors got rid of this problem a long time ago lol and air density sensors
-
300hp vs 507hp,who would win??hmm
-
@geepgeep567 its right hand drive nice try though
-
Look ma, no hands.. That's safe!
-
Naturally aspirated engines experience significant power loss at higher elevation - such as this M5. The 335i being turbocharged may be able to hold the same amount of boost at this elevation and thus does not loose as much power. Having said that, for the 335i to be that much faster even at this elevation has to have some sort of chip t
uning and/or the m5 really did started out of its power band as everyone has said
-
funny joke
-
umm... yeah.. M5 def. wasnt even trying. sorry.
-
why the heck are both of you recording?
someone forgot to push the m button...
GoldenGuard33 7 months ago 17
the m5 started with 4th gear wtf? it sounded like no more than 3000rpm when the race began....
Hellbrawler 3 months ago 9