Give Me an Answer #1609 b Part 2 of 2

Cliffe Knechtle has a dialogue with students at The University of Connecticutt, April of 2009. This is Part 2. The "Give Me An Answer" ministry began as an outgrowth of the dialogues Cliffe Knechtle has had with students on various university campuses throughout the United States. These universities include the University of Maine, Harvard, MIT, University of Florida, University of Texas, University of Wisconsin, University of Minnesota, University of California Los Angeles, University of California San Diego, Berkeley, Stanford, University of Hawaii and the University of Washington. Cliffe spoke on these campuses in front of the Student Union or Library at noon for five to ten minutes. At the close of his initial remarks, he'd open up the time for questions and answers, which usually turned into a two to four hour dialogue with students. His crowd size ranged from 25 - 500 students at a time, and between classes, new students would join the discussion. This was an extremely effective way to reach a large number of university students with the Gospel of Christ.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• College
• scopes
• trial
• redshift
• radiocarbon
• dating
• techniques
• miller
• apparatus
• dna
• molecules
• australopithecus
• archaeopteryx
• entropy
• gill
• slits
• haeckel
• cambrian
• irradiated
• drosophila
• hopeful
• monster
• missing
• links
• fossils
• dinosaurs
• rock

[QuestionChrist]

please put up more of these videos!!  And please put up more on evolution, I was just getting into that last part!

[askcliffe]

See 70 full programs on Yahoo Video!!!

[zachychan3]

cheeseno1, I admire how you are not at all acting like one in denial. keep asking questions and keep that open mind of yours. Most people including myself can not handle such subjects and find it easyer to "cop out" by flat out denying and attacking anything that conflicts with my stand point of evolution. Im like you, Now that im thinking outside what conforts me Im no longer attacking christ or laughing to make me feel like im so right its funny. Keep asking questions and dont become a sheep!

[Purushadasa]

I have posted no beliefs, only facts.

Also, the pig is very sincere in his pursuit of feces to eat, but sincerity alone does not necessarily make any activity admirable. This woman is very sincere in using cheap debate tactics in her desperation to avoid being proven wrong, but she was proven completely wrong anyway, and her intellectual dishonesty in asking such a DUMB question is extremely obvious.

Of course, those with the intelligence of animals can't understand even the obvious.

[cheeseno1]

@Purushadasa Her body language and speech seems quite genuine and sincere to me, however, I won't try and change your beliefs because that would be absolutely futile (especially on the internet). Have a nice day.

[Ravloma]

I have to say that Puruhsadas is absolutely right about this. She is only being stupid and obstructive by asking for a definition of such an obvious word as "love."

Who the FUCK is so DUMB to fail to know what the word "love" means???

She is a scheming, dishonest bitch, and she only used that bizarre and misleading question to avoid the fact that she LOST the debate, and miserably so.

[Purushadasa]

@cheeseno1 Yes, there is something wrong with it, because they both obviously know what the word means, and the ONLY reason why individuals like her use such tactics is to dishonestly side-track other people's valid arguments. With such shameful and intellectually dishonest tactics, she should be atheist, not Muslim, and you should be ashamed of yourself as well.

[cheeseno1]

@Purushadasa To be honest I would've asked for a re-understanding of "Love" myself because like I said it is a very broad term and there is nothing wrong with with that.

[Purushadasa]

@cheeseno1 No. She was just being unnecessarily argumentative.

[cheeseno1]

@Purushadasa Love is a very broad term with many meanings. Love: a strong positive emotion of regard and affection; "his love for his work"; "children need a lot of love" Love: sleep together: have sexual intercourse with Love: a score of zero in tennis or squash; "it was 40 love". When you discuss religion, a subject even bigger than love, you need to understand everything said. She know's what love is in a general sense; she just needs to understand it's context in this specific argument.

[Purushadasa]

When someone says a statement like, "You're gonna have to define the word 'love' for me," you know that the debate is over because she is just being argumentative just for the sake of hearing her own voice arguing, and she has no valid thoughts in her thick skull.

The problem with these snotty kids is that their capacity for empty talk far exceeds their capacity for thinking.

[zsifk]

I'm not sure what the aim of the first discussion was. Does this mean the lady implied that if I sin, God somehow willed it? This does not seem right?