German Chancellor Andrea Merkel Climate Change Summit Speech Copenhagen

http://MOXNews.com/
December 17, 2009 C-SPAN

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• German
• Chancellor
• Andrea
• Merkel
• Climate
• Change
• Summit
• Copenhagen
• speech

[Murmelman71]

so ignorant,stupid nerds can never save the world.

[wdcsucks1]

if i am not mistaken, merkels master (helmut kohl) is a bilderberger or was an attendee of one (or more) of their meetings.

[lorrieringel]

..fantastic videos, thanks for sharing .. keep it up =)

[fauffe]

Merkel is really good!

[BeortheMad]

You watch to much fox news. Get some better sources for your information.

Can you point me to one of those many articles you are talking about that counter global warming?

[ager74]

As you will be aware the whole point of science is to publish all the data, and the method, so all other scientists can recreate and come to similar conlusions fundamental science procedure. Other scientists, for many years inside and outside of the climate payroll, have reported that they can not come to the published and accepted conclusions. And in doing this get sidelined or loose grants or intimidated. This is no more than a culture, and until it is cleared up a tax is not the answer

[ager74]

We must think of it like this, the funded science, is to prove that global warming is a threat, to dissprove it, is not funded, so therefor every scientist that wants to enlarge the grant has to beleive in it, or thereis no funding.

2. Secondly the recent e'mails disclosing potential fudging of data at Hadley CRU, needs a proper investigation, also NIWA should be investigated re:sea temps. Also the Met office after Russia claimed the temps published were not accurate. This is not science

[BeortheMad]

1: It will never be more then a theory, just like with everything in science you can't prove anything to be a fact, you can only disprove things. But if the theory is backed up by so many individual peer reviewed articles and data it's pretty close to a fact.

2: If this is all a scam like you are saying, than why? Peer review is not a matter of belief... And who has the power to organize your plan globe-wide. Also there would be tons of articles countering the theory and there aren't.

[ager74]

One more thing, do not beleive everything you are told the peer reveiw process is even under investigation by the IPCC itself, when you have people of the same beleif reveiwing a paper, who are funded to beleive that beleif, all unbiased opinion goes out of the window. The right way for science to opperate and to be seen as unbiased would be to give the peer reveiw process to sceptics, if the science as you say is fact then it should stand up. But as has been seen time and time again it dosent

[ager74]

My freind a fact is a very difficult thing to be determined, AWG is far from a fact even the IPCC at present only represent it as a theory, so that is the first. Natural occuring temp flucuations over the history of our planet, is far more beleivable. The percentages 5% of the Raw Data has never been released under FOI requests dating more than 10 years, this in itself shows that a:either the data is contradictry. or b: they have lost it. So as for it being is complete nonsense

[BeortheMad]

Global warming is a fact and the role that man plays is big, there are an insane amount of peer-reviewed articles underlining this.

That's why I'm confused and asked you based on which grounds you believe global warming isn't an issue.

And I don't really understand the later part of your reply, what about those percentages?