Re: Keith Olbermann:To Mr. Bush Shut the Hell Up!

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,327
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 1, 2008

Video Cam Direct Upload

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 5 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (maybin16)

  • Saddam had killed many, many Iraqi citizens after the 1991 Gulf War.

    GW Bush sent about 1/4 of American Forces to places near to Iraq saying, 'Allow the UN Inspectors in or else.'

    At this point French, Russian, and Chinese Ministries said, 'Please don't attack Iraq'.

    At this point Saddam laughed.

    My guess is France, Russia, and China knew they were causing a situation where the USA had to attack or go back home with their tails between their legs.

    What would you have done?

  • @EagleMedieval

    That is of no importance to the facts at hand. Bottom line Saddam was no threat to this nation. Saddem, as proven by Bush's people themselves had NO wmd's. They did not have the power, money, or ability to attack us in any way...again this was proven by Bushes own team. Bin Laden did have the power to attack and did attack us. Saddem was not the problem bin laden was and is. The attack should have stayed on bin laden and all those that protect him.

  • @EagleMedieval

    Maybe you can not read very well...

    Let me explain it another way. Bin Laben and his network attacked this nation. fter we started the attack on him we should have stayed with and wiped them out. Saddam was NOT a threat to this nation...PROVEN BY BUSH'S OWN PEOPLE

  • If you followed Iraq before 9/11 you might not be clueless.

  • Followed before 9/11 and seen what? Would we have seen that there was no connection to Bin Laden? (Wait that was proven by the experts) would have seen that there they, Iraq, was no threat to this nation for which we live...wait that was proven also. so what in the hell would we have seen I ask?\

Top Comments

  • When Bush invaded Iraq, he was no better than Saddam when he invaded Kuwait.

  • Excellent!

Video Responses

This video is a response to Keith Olbermann:To Mr. Bush Shut the Hell Up!
see all

All Comments (29)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • You are absolutely right, the battle shoud have been in Afghanistan in the first place.

    You are saying everything I have said over the past 10 years I wish I had the courage to do what you did.

  • AMEN! great video, it's all true! I agree with you 100%!

  • Why bother trying to reason with the idiots? you think they will get it now?

  • Very well spoken

  • i love you

  • Oh I see. You're saying we should have just looked over Saddam's constant advocacy of terrorism and his pledge to send money to the families of Palestinian suicide bombers' who were willing to attack Israel ... and then wait for him to send a can of biological agents into the USA and kill maybe 1/2 a million Americans and then we would do something after the fact.

    No, I don't agree.

  • GW Bush had said to the world, 'you are for us or against us'.

    Saddam had said, 'It is now possible to kill thousands ... no millions with biological weapons in a container that will fit in your hand, like a can of pepsi'

    Saddam had pledged something like $15,000-25,000 for suicide-bombers' families that had entered Israel.

    Saddam had defied several UN Resolutions, including allowing UN inspectors into Iraq to search for WMD. Clinton had let him get by with it.

    (To be continued)

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more