911stealth WTC Adjacent Building Reflection Evocates Pyrocool FEF Used on Masking Radioactivity
Uploader Comments (911stealth)
All Comments (10)
-
a lot of questions are generated by these types of vidoes, like wheres the plane/missle/drone, but these are distractions. watch the clip again and ask yourself should a fireball that size come without some kind of explosive noise heard from the vantage of this shot? i would certainly think you'd hear it with the window open, you hear the collapse why not the impact?
also be aware that everyone being asked on the street is saying.. i didnt see a plane...
-
a lot of questions are generated by these types of vidoes, like wheres the plane/missle/drone, but these are distractions. watch the clip again and ask yourself should a fireball that size come without some kind of explosive noise heard from the vantage of this shot? i would certainly think you'd hear it with the window open, you hear the collapse why not the impact?
-
@2JOHNNYT Holy crap dude, that actually fits a lot of pieces together, how something managed to crash into the buildings even though 10 professional pilots could not do it themselves in a simulation, explains why software was used(i forget the name of that soft), but there's still 1 question - why doesn't anybody have a recording of the drones? Or are there at least videos of differently looking aircraft making the second hit? Because I've only seen 1 plane.. I think. Do you have any links?
-
@i4mat Im a native of Brooklyn, I had good child hood friends working on the roof of the Downtown Athletic club that day. They said the plane came right over them. Before I spoke to them I believed missile. NOw I believe they DRONED the towers but the planes one tv were CARTOONS. Drones would react to normal physics - the whole plane would not enter, and therefore most sheep would not believe the towers would collapse, hence cartoons go right in and the people believe
-
@911stealth Maybe in the sidebar you can expound upon the title of this vid - cause i have no idea what it means and would like to find out . Thanks
-
And I don't mean to sound ignorant, but let's imagine for a second that there was no second plane - wouldn't there be hundreds of videos showing it? I understand that software can easily insert a plane into any video feed that was shown on mainstream news, but I only saw 1 video that doesn't have a plane present prior to the explosion and it's on your channel(NfkD6JoV4xg), it would be much easier to cut the plane out of 1 video then insert it into hundreds of civilian videos. Or are there more?
-
I would like to use the power given to me by my first view and comment to ask you this:
Why was the part of the plane approaching cut out?
I have seen this video a long time ago and it never made sense, they're recording for a long time and the few seconds where you can actually see the plane are missing?
I refuse to believe the "no plane" theory, but why cut out the main event?
Does anyone have any info on that?
What happened to the window cleaners of WTC7 clearly visible in the Bob and Bri video?
911stealth 1 year ago