Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER 1974

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
53,428
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 17, 2009

Arnold Schwarzenegger 1974 guest posing, this was Arnolds prime year in offseason, guest posing at about 250-260 lbs, Arnold was best bodybuilder ever, pre Grownth Hormon (GH) era champion, he had best chest ever, best biceps ever and one of the best calfs ever...
measurements:
arms 22+"
chest 57-58"
weist 33"
thighs 29"
calfs 20"
Thanks for watching and please rate and do comment:)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (ARNOLDisPREDATOR)

  • off season? looks like contest shape to me.still cut.

  • @OLDTIME47 yes,he is here more cut (even if it is his offseason) then sergio had ever been!! LOL!!!!

  • @ARNOLDisPREDATOR LOL! So true! :D

  • @jamesluc256 yes!!!! :)

see all

All Comments (126)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • amazing back !!!

  • That is a very lonely statement of yours to say Ron Coleman had a chest that matched Arnolds. Shall we take a look at midsection/abs and see who's "better"?  And as far as all other body parts are concerned I will again say....bigger does not necessarily mean better. It just means bigger.

  • @kcflexer I strongly disagree with everything you just said. I would argue that Arnold was far better in comparison to his competition than anyone else you mentioned is to theirs. Also I believe Arnolds symmetry, balance, + proportions are superior. I suppose you yourself are "better than Arnold" as well. Obviously the bodybuilding look you think best is the 6/chicken breast sitting eating, 7 scoops protein powder/shake drinking fat ass for 8 months out of the year look. Not me.

  • nice comeback havent heard that before and nothing beats 1999 ronnie coleman hes way better than arnold

  • @kcflexer Well its 2 bad U have 2 bring graphic homosexuality into it. Im sure its something you think about often. Ronnie was a great bodybuilder but I think we can all agree he is overweight & unrefined compared 2 Arnold. The best is not the biggest but the most perfectly developed. Arnold made this painful realization when a 60 lb. smaller Frank Zane beat him. From there he started chiseling down from 250 towards perfection. He has a quality physique still unequaled.

  • @drwcody im glad that u like the fact that arnolds a pimp and like going down on him, but needless to say ronnie is the king my friend

  • @PersianOak he wasnt260 ever maybe offseason but i doubt it he kept close to his prep

  • @kcflexer Also, 1990 coleman better than 1974 Arnold? With his 5'11 height, high lats, distended gut, narrow clavicles and overcompensating delts? The only thing that saved his physique and made him look good was his huge ribcage and the fact that competition was laughable.

    Better arms? His biceps look tiny and weird. Legs? Quad sweeps are probs for retards like you.

    Arnold was soft in legs? Bitch, since 1990s, bbs look soft all over.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more