COH - 2 tigers vs 2 m26, m10 y sherman
Top Comments
All Comments (368)
-
there not chaeting its a tiger ace !!!
-
@halorecon95 I never said yanks were any good either. They're just one step down on the shitlist imo.
-
@randomperson2538 Americans are good you wanna say?
ever played Eve great community, very much russians, World of Tanks, very much russians, WOW great community when playing, shity community when losing your acc through hacking or if you piss off a guild, many americans...
-
@Tofu64Vagine T34 had a bad gun, the 76mm main gun was very in accurate and had a low velocity barrel which made the inpact less the that of a 75mm from a Pz.IV, also the T34's armor was strong in the early days of the war, it was rubish against a Panther let alone a Tiger...
-
@Tofu64Vagine Dude, they could make it so its pretty even. Like Stalingrad for instance would make for great gameplay. Kursk etc..lots of flaks and armor would be great...
-
@gettincrazywithit Russian T-34 is too rigged for the game its cheap to make and has good armor and good gun itll outplay the panzers plus the soviets had a large army so troops are cheaper to make and stuff
-
@superassasinz no its not
-
But if there were 2 axis that had 2 tigers, then 2 Blizkrieg doctrines, as they have done to launch the v1? Fucking cheaters...
-
@gettincrazywithit because a game that includes russians draws lots more russians to it. And if you've played men of war, you will notice that russians are the worst community of gamers in existence.
-
such a legendary RTS, why dont they make coh2 eastern front or someshit??
@MrAbram94 really. I think both players are noobs.
HektorPedo 8 months ago 10
u guys should try world of tanks...............its realistic,very
superassasinz 8 months ago 7