THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE ACTION OF 2ND CONTINTENTAL CONGRESS JULY 4,1776) "WE HOLD THESE TRUTHS TO SELF-EVIDENT THAT ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL, THAT THEY ARE ENDOWED BY THEIR CREATOR WITH CERTAIN UNALIENABLE RIGHTS, THAT AMONG THESE ARE LIFE LIBERTY AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS THAT TO SECURE THESE RIGHTS GOVERNMENTS ARE INSTITUTED AMONG MEN DERIVING THEIR JUST POWERS FROM THE CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED" ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT GOVERNEMT MUST HAVE THE CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED. TO ISSUE A CHILD SUPPORT ORDER AND A ORDER OF GARNISHMENT OF WAGES. THE STATE OF OHIO NEVER HAD A BILL OF EXCHANGE, AND THERE IS NO CONSIDERATION, TO THE FALSE CONTRACT. THERE IS NO JURISDICTION. BY THE STATE OF OHIO WHERE A COURT IS WITHOUT JURISDICTION IT'S ACTS AND PROCEEDINGS ARE VOID THIS COURT SHALL TAKE MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE, THAT WERE A COURT IS WITHOUT JURISDICTION IN THE PARTICULAR CASE. IT'S ACTS AND PROCEEDINGS CAN BE OF NO FORCE OR VALIDITY AND ARE A MERE NULLITY AND VOID, NOT VOIDABLE, EVEN PRIOR TO REVERSAL, WHEITHER THE LACK OF JURISDICTION APPEARS ON THE FACE OF THE RECORD OR BY PROOF OUTSIDE OF IT WHERE BY RENDERING ANY COURT ORDER ISSUE NULL AND VOID. (MAIN V. THIBOUTOT 100 5CT 2502)(1980) THE LAW PROVIDES THAT ONCE STATE AND FEDERAL JURISDICTION HAS BEEN CHALLENGED IT MUST BE PROVEN. AND FURTHER THIS COURT SHALL TAKE MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE OF THE ADJUDGED DECISION OF THESE CASES. A U.S. DISTRICT COURT IN NEW YORK HAS HELD THAT THE CHILD SUPPORT RECOVERY ACT(CSRA) VIOLATES THE 10TH AMENDMENT BECAUSE IT EXCEEDS CONGRESS'S POWER TO REGULATE INTERSTATE COMMERCE THE STATUE IMPOSES CRIMINAL SANCTIONS ON NON-CUSTODIAL PARENTS WHO HAVE WILLFULLY FAILED TO MAKE COURT ORDERED SUPPORT PAYMENTS FOR THEIR CHILDREN LIVING IN ANOTHER STATE(UNITED STATES V. KING)(2001) JANAURY 29.2002 A TENNESSE COURT OF APPEALS ISSUED AN OPINION THAT TENNESSEE'S CHILD SUPPORT GUIDELINES NOT HAVING A PRESUMPTIVE FORMULA FOR ENSUING THAT ALL OF AN OBLIGOR'S DEPENDENTS RECEIVED SUPPORT ON AN EQUAL BASIS VIOLATED EQUAL PROTECTION RIGHTS AND IS UNCONSTITIONAL(DEE ANN CURTIS GALLAHER V. CURTIS)(2002) CHILD SUPPORT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AS IT VIOLATES THE GUARANTEES OF DUE PROCESS, EQUAL PROTECTION AND PRIVACY AND AS AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL TAKING OF PROPERTY. US. CONST. AMENDMENT 4 "THE RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE TO BE SECURE IN THEIR PERSONS, HOUSES,PAPERS AND EFFECTS,AGAINST UNREASONABLE SEARCHES AND SEIZURES SHALL NOT BE VIOLATED." U.S. CONST. AMENDMENT 5 " NO ONE SHALL BE DEPRIVED OF LIFE LIBERTY OR PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW NOR SHALL PRIVATE PROPERTY BE TAKEN FOR PUBLICE USE WITHOUT JUST COMPENSATION" OFFICERS OF THE COURT HAVE NO IMMUNITY FROM LIABLITY WHEN VIOLATING A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT AND MAY BE HELD PERSONALLY LIABLE FOR DAMAGES UNDER 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 FOR THEY ARE DEEMED TO KNOW THE LAW (OWENS V. INDEPENDENCE 445 U.S. 621,100 SCT)(1938) IN ADDITION EVERY STATE AND COUNTY OFFICER HAVE TAKEN AN OATH TO SUPPORT PROTECT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION AND GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES. I NOBLE SHAHEED ALLAH EL DEMAND THAT THE STATE OF OHIO PROVE ON THE RECORD AND PROVIDE HARD EVIDENCE A WRIT THAT A ABORIGINAL,INDIGENOUS MOORISH NATIONAL DIVINE BEING FREE SOVEREIGN CAN BE NAMED IN A CODE. THEREFORE I NOBLE SHAHEED ALLAH EL CHARGE THE STATE OF OHIO, OHIO C.S.P.C. INCLUDING HAMILTON COUNTY JUVENILE COURT WITH FRAUDULMENT PRACTICES AND HEREBY PETITION U.S. DISTRICT COURT TO ORDER THE FRAUDULENT CLAIM BY THE STATE OF OHIO, AGAINST NOBLE SHAHEED ALLAH EL PURSUANT TO THE U.S. COSNTITUTION DISMISSED. IN ADDITION I DEMAND THAT THE SAID PERSON'S DISCONTINUE, UNCONSCIONABLE AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL, PRACTICES AND SUPPORT SAID CONSTITUTION. WHICH IS THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND. I NOBLE SHAHEED ALLAH EL ALSO SEEK A CIVIL REMEDY IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT. AGAINST THE STATE OF OHIO 777,000 U.S. DOLLARS.
Islam Brotha - Bang on the system daily. But also, make sure the little nobles are taken care of . If the chick was trifling- then get custody of ur kids. But, If she is not, and u just dont wana pay- U MAKE ALL MUURS look bad.
msalozie 1 year ago
@msalozie first of all get your mind right and read why the lawsuit was brought about before you make comments like that. and the moors look bad any way fake'n like they wan;t freedom and ain't nothing but uncle toms and house negroes with accepted of a few.
noblemoorishgod 1 year ago
@msalozie no body need a pale face european nor a house negro in a dress to make them pay support for their children. once again read the lawsuit and the events that lead up to the suit before you comment
noblemoorishgod 1 year ago
yeah but you did not win! did they give you a jugement> NO!!!!!!!
xXNastyNine308Xx 2 years ago
@xXNastyNine308Xx i will bang with you anything you ready pale face stop hiding behind a p.c. and met me in on the battle field and we will see on won.
noblemoorishgod 2 years ago
@xXNastyNine308Xx also learn how to spell before you post a comment dumb ass it is judgement not jugement.
noblemoorishgod 2 years ago