Top scientist speak about The Top God :Jesus Christ. God love all scientists but only few scientist love God because they put science in place of God.Also Dawkins and Watson presented their opinion .
It is not possible to have the firmist and fairest of perspectives on matters such as these, until you can understand that faith is believing without knowing.
@5tonyvvvv I could actually discuss or even expand on those questions, but as I said before, it's really not worth while trying to have a sensible conversation with someone who has already made up their mind based on superstition and dogma. That's the sad part in asking those questions; they are very interesting questions within the domain of cosmology and are well worth discussing, but here they are representative of an "ah ha, gotcha!", rather than a genuine inquisitive desire to understand.
@hughJ25 What produced the energy for the big bang? and how was it set in motion? How did the first atom form? If atheists dont believe something from nothing like what Collins says, then Atheists believe Matter, Energy, and time always existed! and I would not dismiss Jesus christ as just mythology!
@5tonyvvvv The problem with arguing with theists is that they're generally tethered to their assertion of the existence of a personal God that they've come to be familiar with through their religion. That sort of tether does not exist for an atheist. I'm more than open to talking sensibly about evidence suggesting the need for a creator. But I can only do that with people who are able to be equally sensible and discard their grip on mythology that is clearly the product of man.
Scientific world view and Spiritual world view as compatible? Its already been done for over 2000 years in Buddhism.
DJmixmastermicro 2 days ago
Craig Venter is the greater of the two... he mapped the human genome of his own bat... without government funding.
hawkinscraig05 2 weeks ago
@sammyjs1983 Fail.
MakeGyoza 3 weeks ago
Proud to be a christian and future medical doctor :)
sammyjs1983 3 weeks ago
It is not possible to have the firmist and fairest of perspectives on matters such as these, until you can understand that faith is believing without knowing.
wearyourseatbelt 3 weeks ago
@5tonyvvvv Observations and hypotheses. Now I think you're just trolling. Have a nice day.
hughJ25 3 weeks ago
@hughJ25 You would explain them as ASSUMPTIONS like what most atheists do!
5tonyvvvv 3 weeks ago
@5tonyvvvv I could actually discuss or even expand on those questions, but as I said before, it's really not worth while trying to have a sensible conversation with someone who has already made up their mind based on superstition and dogma. That's the sad part in asking those questions; they are very interesting questions within the domain of cosmology and are well worth discussing, but here they are representative of an "ah ha, gotcha!", rather than a genuine inquisitive desire to understand.
hughJ25 3 weeks ago
@hughJ25 What produced the energy for the big bang? and how was it set in motion? How did the first atom form? If atheists dont believe something from nothing like what Collins says, then Atheists believe Matter, Energy, and time always existed! and I would not dismiss Jesus christ as just mythology!
5tonyvvvv 4 weeks ago
@5tonyvvvv The problem with arguing with theists is that they're generally tethered to their assertion of the existence of a personal God that they've come to be familiar with through their religion. That sort of tether does not exist for an atheist. I'm more than open to talking sensibly about evidence suggesting the need for a creator. But I can only do that with people who are able to be equally sensible and discard their grip on mythology that is clearly the product of man.
hughJ25 4 weeks ago