I strongly agree. Also, people with compulsions currently benefit the most from DBS to the reward system (see site for references), so it's not as far-fetched as it might seem.
I don't know. I do agree that any research should be open but I can't help but to feel skeptical about this whole endeavor but it must be researched if their is even the slightest thought that it could in some way help people or even save lives. Good luck to you and your research. May I give a suggestion? Maybe this technology could help addicts, I could see that for sure. Better than intoxicating the buddy with drugs damaging the liver and kidneys... Maybe?
Users who nevertheless feel a strong need to cheat would have to break the access control encryption of their own iPlant. This encryption would be in place to prevent all forms of unauthorized access and would have to be very sophisticated and heavily enforced.
Hey, thanks for commenting. 1) Rewarding brain stimulation (RBS) is different from heroin: it's brief (<1s), it's delivered throughout the rewarded task (e.g. with each pull on an exercise machine) and in the case of iPlants the electrical current would be as weak as possible. 2) There's no intention to stop delivering RBS and hope users would continue: RBS for relevant tasks would be provided indefinitely. 3) People are not rats but the reward systems of the two species are remarkably similar.
I have watched all your videos here and I agree this research needs to be open but I see failure already. What your saying is no different than giving someone heroin after doing something rewarding as if they will later without the heroin, repeat the same task. This is false however because they will instead seek out more heroin. People are not rats, they will know where the reward came from and seek it out. It is unavoidable. I repeat, we are not RATS!
I strongly agree. Also, people with compulsions currently benefit the most from DBS to the reward system (see site for references), so it's not as far-fetched as it might seem.
iPlantChannel 2 years ago
I don't know. I do agree that any research should be open but I can't help but to feel skeptical about this whole endeavor but it must be researched if their is even the slightest thought that it could in some way help people or even save lives. Good luck to you and your research. May I give a suggestion? Maybe this technology could help addicts, I could see that for sure. Better than intoxicating the buddy with drugs damaging the liver and kidneys... Maybe?
SavageDogg38 2 years ago
Users who nevertheless feel a strong need to cheat would have to break the access control encryption of their own iPlant. This encryption would be in place to prevent all forms of unauthorized access and would have to be very sophisticated and heavily enforced.
iPlantChannel 2 years ago
Hey, thanks for commenting. 1) Rewarding brain stimulation (RBS) is different from heroin: it's brief (<1s), it's delivered throughout the rewarded task (e.g. with each pull on an exercise machine) and in the case of iPlants the electrical current would be as weak as possible. 2) There's no intention to stop delivering RBS and hope users would continue: RBS for relevant tasks would be provided indefinitely. 3) People are not rats but the reward systems of the two species are remarkably similar.
iPlantChannel 2 years ago
I have watched all your videos here and I agree this research needs to be open but I see failure already. What your saying is no different than giving someone heroin after doing something rewarding as if they will later without the heroin, repeat the same task. This is false however because they will instead seek out more heroin. People are not rats, they will know where the reward came from and seek it out. It is unavoidable. I repeat, we are not RATS!
SavageDogg38 2 years ago