No, I am saying that the evidence "around you" has nothing to do with your ability to trust yourself. I am not questioning anarchy as a personal philosophy here.
"You claim that "the evidence is all around us", which, I'm sorry to say, is not an irrefutable fact." Kevin you are questioning the validity of anarchy, why are you playing this game? lol
Huh? Again, what is with this defensive stance on anarchy? All I've tried to do is point out faith in action. I have not once mentioned that anarchy isn't a rational personal philosophy.
Do you not take care of yourself w/o a ruler? Does a ruler brush your teeth for you in the morning? Do you not ensure that you have a place to sleep at night? So you have full confidence and trust that global warming isn't a huge issue? Ok.
You claim that "the evidence is all around us", which, I'm sorry to say, is not an irrefutable fact. Which suggests faith in the matter. Again, not a bad thing. I have faith that global warming isn't as huge of an issue as society wants me to believe, but it very well could be.
And I still don't agree with the way you're using faith "full confidence and trust" as I explained that is not needed either. And she was using faith in regards to the other definition. So you actually don't agree with her.
Actually, it seems that depending upon how one defines redutionism, that can also be compatable with holism....
... at least from what I get by reading the wikipedia articles....
blackacidlizzard 2 years ago
I think it does. The evidence around me directly affects my ability to trust myself, because then I would be trusting myself based upon faith.
Freemarketeer81 2 years ago
No, I am saying that the evidence "around you" has nothing to do with your ability to trust yourself. I am not questioning anarchy as a personal philosophy here.
fungku777 2 years ago
"You claim that "the evidence is all around us", which, I'm sorry to say, is not an irrefutable fact." Kevin you are questioning the validity of anarchy, why are you playing this game? lol
Freemarketeer81 2 years ago
No I have full confidence in myself. I don't use that word.
Freemarketeer81 2 years ago
Huh? Again, what is with this defensive stance on anarchy? All I've tried to do is point out faith in action. I have not once mentioned that anarchy isn't a rational personal philosophy.
fungku777 2 years ago
Do you not take care of yourself w/o a ruler? Does a ruler brush your teeth for you in the morning? Do you not ensure that you have a place to sleep at night? So you have full confidence and trust that global warming isn't a huge issue? Ok.
Freemarketeer81 2 years ago
Which is a round about way of saying you have faith in yourself. :-)
fungku777 2 years ago
You claim that "the evidence is all around us", which, I'm sorry to say, is not an irrefutable fact. Which suggests faith in the matter. Again, not a bad thing. I have faith that global warming isn't as huge of an issue as society wants me to believe, but it very well could be.
fungku777 2 years ago
And I still don't agree with the way you're using faith "full confidence and trust" as I explained that is not needed either. And she was using faith in regards to the other definition. So you actually don't agree with her.
Freemarketeer81 2 years ago